XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: dtravel@sonic.net   
      
   On 8/31/2014 11:20 PM, David Johnston wrote:   
   > On 9/1/2014 12:12 AM, Your Name wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>>     including any even remote hope of a getting properly fitting   
   >>>>     addition.   
   >>>   
   >>> That also doesn't make sense. First of all, you can indeed get   
   >>> installments of questionable style followed by a better one -- the   
   >>> silliness factor in Superman III and Superman IV was gone again in   
   >>> Superman Returns, and lots of people think Man of Steel was as good as   
   >>> Superman II. And second, if there ever is a "properly fitting addition"   
   >>> you'll come here and start whining that it "destroyed the franchise" and   
   >>> "why couldn't they make something *original* for once?"   
   >>   
   >> "Good", there's your pointlessly idiotic opinion.   
   >>   
   >> Whether it's "good" or not isn't relevant to the point. The reboot   
   >> version would still be just as "good" if it used a different name and   
   >> so didn't pee all over the original.   
   >   
   > Except for the part where it doesn't get to air.   
   >   
   In which case the odds are even higher that it wasn't very good to start   
   with.   
      
   --   
   "The Snark must flow!" - Shaddam Emperor Animfsk the 8th   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)