XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article ,   
   anim8rFSK  wrote:   
      
   > In article <54052c84$0$36537$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,   
   >  Dimensional Traveler  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On 9/1/2014 5:15 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   > > > In article <020920140913347621%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
   > > >   Your Name  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > >> In article , infinitude   
   > > >>  wrote:   
   > > >>> Your Name  ::   
   > > >>>> I said it destroys the franchise. It makes a confused mess of   
   > > >>>> conflicting versions all with the same name.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>> Ten years of SG-1, five of Atlantis, and two of Universe   
   > > >>> appear not to have destroyed the original Stargate film's   
   > > >>> franchise, since Emmerich and Devlin now seem to be   
   > > >>> rebooting that.  Which suggests nothing can:   
   > > >>   
   > > >> If those two fools do "reboot" it you'll end up with at least two   
   > > >> (technically three) different versions of "Stargate" ...   
   > > >   
   > > > We're at 3 now - the movie, and the TV show, in both 'trout' and 'no   
   > > > trout' flavor.   
   > > >   
   > > "Trout" and "No Trout"?   
   >   
   > Yah, about 3/4 of the way, they went into the past, and the original   
   > characters died and new alternate universe ones took over, the most   
   > obvious difference being that the pond at Jack's cabin never had trout   
   > before, and in the new Stargateverse, it did ... all the episodes after   
   > that are in a different reality.   
      
   There's also the animated series which is set a little in the future of   
   SG1, but I never saw enough episodes to judge whether that fitted or   
   not with (almost) everything else.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)