XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article ,   
   anim8rFSK  wrote:   
   > In article <020920141623573736%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
   >  Your Name  wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > > anim8rFSK  wrote:   
   > > > In article <54052c84$0$36537$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,   
   > > >  Dimensional Traveler  wrote:   
   > > > > On 9/1/2014 5:15 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   > > > > > In article <020920140913347621%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
   > > > > >   Your Name  wrote:   
   > > > > >> In article , infinitude   
   > > > > >>  wrote:   
   > > > > >>> Your Name  ::   
   > > > > >>>> I said it destroys the franchise. It makes a confused mess of   
   > > > > >>>> conflicting versions all with the same name.   
   > > > > >>>   
   > > > > >>> Ten years of SG-1, five of Atlantis, and two of Universe   
   > > > > >>> appear not to have destroyed the original Stargate film's   
   > > > > >>> franchise, since Emmerich and Devlin now seem to be   
   > > > > >>> rebooting that.  Which suggests nothing can:   
   > > > > >>   
   > > > > >> If those two fools do "reboot" it you'll end up with at least two   
   > > > > >> (technically three) different versions of "Stargate" ...   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > We're at 3 now - the movie, and the TV show, in both 'trout' and 'no   
   > > > > > trout' flavor.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > "Trout" and "No Trout"?   
   > > >   
   > > > Yah, about 3/4 of the way, they went into the past, and the original   
   > > > characters died and new alternate universe ones took over, the most   
   > > > obvious difference being that the pond at Jack's cabin never had trout   
   > > > before, and in the new Stargateverse, it did ... all the episodes after   
   > > > that are in a different reality.   
   > >   
   > > There's also the animated series which is set a little in the future of   
   > > SG1, but I never saw enough episodes to judge whether that fitted or   
   > > not with (almost) everything else.   
   >   
   > Yeah, I skipped that, 'cause I never saw it, and when I asked somebody   
   > who did watch it if it was in continuity with SG1 they said they had no   
   > idea.   
      
   Because it was set in the future of the live-action shows, it didn't   
   have any physical connection other than using Stargates to hop from   
   planet to planet (in a "we're lost and want to get home" Voyager / Lost   
   in Space style). No doubt the alien planets and aliens they visited   
   were all new, so it may easily have fitted with what came before and   
   after it as a separate entity and without causing any issues.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)