XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: dtravel@sonic.net   
      
   On 9/2/2014 8:48 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   > In article <54068737$0$36590$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,   
   >   Dimensional Traveler  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 9/1/2014 7:41 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>> In article <54052c84$0$36537$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,   
   >>>    Dimensional Traveler  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 9/1/2014 5:15 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>>>> In article <020920140913347621%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
   >>>>>     Your Name  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> In article , infinitude   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> Your Name  ::   
   >>>>>>>> I said it destroys the franchise. It makes a confused mess of   
   >>>>>>>> conflicting versions all with the same name.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Ten years of SG-1, five of Atlantis, and two of Universe   
   >>>>>>> appear not to have destroyed the original Stargate film's   
   >>>>>>> franchise, since Emmerich and Devlin now seem to be   
   >>>>>>> rebooting that.  Which suggests nothing can:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If those two fools do "reboot" it you'll end up with at least two   
   >>>>>> (technically three) different versions of "Stargate" ...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> We're at 3 now - the movie, and the TV show, in both 'trout' and 'no   
   >>>>> trout' flavor.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> "Trout" and "No Trout"?   
   >>>   
   >>> Yah, about 3/4 of the way, they went into the past, and the original   
   >>> characters died and new alternate universe ones took over, the most   
   >>> obvious difference being that the pond at Jack's cabin never had trout   
   >>> before, and in the new Stargateverse, it did ... all the episodes after   
   >>> that are in a different reality.   
   >>>   
   >> Ah.  I'd say a different timeline rather than different reality.  That   
   >> Quantum Mirror thingie led to different realities.  I also seem to   
   >> recall there were other episodes that clearly established that the SG-1   
   >> timeline/reality was perhaps the luckiest one of a really large number   
   >> of alternatives in a three or four axis matrix of universes.   
   >   
   > Yeah, I didn't get into that, because they didn't end up in any of   
   > those, but they did end up in a different timeline, and somewhere one   
   > presumes their original timeline exists without them.   
   >   
   If so it wasn't the first time.  They also changed their own timeline   
   sending a message back in time to warn themselves about that "friendly"   
   race that sterilized the human race the first time they met them.So   
   there are at least two "original" timelines running loose in the multiverse.   
      
   Also as I recall that trip back to ancient Egypt the end result was that   
   the team never had to go back in time.  Ironically because they already   
   had.  So I think what actually happened is that a second SG-1 team   
   spontaneously appeared in ancient Egypt, did what they did to leave a   
   ZPM for the future and then lived out their lives in Egypt while the   
   "original" team stayed in their own time.  And Jack was just not   
   interested enough in actually catching fish to realize there actually   
   were fish there in the first place.  :D   
      
   --   
   "The Snark must flow!" - Shaddam Emperor Animfsk the 8th   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)