XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: dtravel@sonic.net
On 9/1/2014 7:41 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <54052c84$0$36537$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> Dimensional Traveler wrote:
>
>> On 9/1/2014 5:15 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
>>> In article <020920140913347621%YourName@YourISP.com>,
>>> Your Name wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article , infinitude
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Your Name ::
>>>>>> I said it destroys the franchise. It makes a confused mess of
>>>>>> conflicting versions all with the same name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ten years of SG-1, five of Atlantis, and two of Universe
>>>>> appear not to have destroyed the original Stargate film's
>>>>> franchise, since Emmerich and Devlin now seem to be
>>>>> rebooting that. Which suggests nothing can:
>>>>
>>>> If those two fools do "reboot" it you'll end up with at least two
>>>> (technically three) different versions of "Stargate" ...
>>>
>>> We're at 3 now - the movie, and the TV show, in both 'trout' and 'no
>>> trout' flavor.
>>>
>> "Trout" and "No Trout"?
>
> Yah, about 3/4 of the way, they went into the past, and the original
> characters died and new alternate universe ones took over, the most
> obvious difference being that the pond at Jack's cabin never had trout
> before, and in the new Stargateverse, it did ... all the episodes after
> that are in a different reality.
>
Ah. I'd say a different timeline rather than different reality. That
Quantum Mirror thingie led to different realities. I also seem to
recall there were other episodes that clearly established that the SG-1
timeline/reality was perhaps the luckiest one of a really large number
of alternatives in a three or four axis matrix of universes.
--
"The Snark must flow!" - Shaddam Emperor Animfsk the 8th
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
