XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments   
   From: renayspam@yahoo.com   
      
   "Will Dockery"  wrote in message   
   news:1109536972.044813.156220@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   > Karla wrote:   
   >> On 27 Feb 2005 12:07:20 -0800, "Will Dockery"   
   >  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >> >Rob Evans wrote:   
   >> >> In message <781a0$42221f92$18d62363$31171@KNOLOGY.NET>, Will   
   > Dockery   
   >> >wrote   
   >> >> >> >> Sorry, I dropped to my knees, literally, laffing, at this   
   >> >CatShit   
   >> >> >> > below.   
   >> >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> nice job leaving the dates out again, Drunkery!   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >I can leave the dates if you want, Renny Skank James.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> okay, class, let's begin. below is a "poem"   
   >> >> >> obviously, if it was worth saving I'd have   
   >> >> >> rewritten it once I got a better handle and   
   >> >> >> some education on what poetry is. (NOTE:   
   >> >> >> it's not about heart, soul, etc.) so together let's   
   >> >> >> see what we can salvage. if not, let's simply   
   >> >> >> figure out where it all went so terribly wrong.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >You posted the crap, you must have thought it was good, huh?   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Everybody posts here to find out if it's any good.  Renay clearly   
   >> >said   
   >> >> that she has long ago come to the conclusion that it wasn't.   
   >> >   
   >> >It was as good as "Specter", which is not.   
   >>   
   >> How so?  Do enlighten us.  Or, make it easy on yourself and admit you   
   > know   
   >> shit about poetry.   
   >   
   > It's never worked that way here before, Karla.   
   >   
   > I commented on the poems far more than most of the "critcs" here do   
   > [short *list*], suck as Gamble and JRS.   
   >   
   > Renny's poetry I've commented on, and reviewed, at length.   
      
   no, you've posted and reposted the same uninformed   
   confession (for some reason, you seem to think anyone cares   
   whether you've felt the same way or had the same experience   
   as the narrator) over and over. and lest we forget, there's the "review"   
   you hope never resurfaces about how gardening in the daylight is   
   really a metaphor for rough sex. wherever did *that* gem get to?   
      
   >   
   > Feel free to defend them if you want, but my commentary is that she   
   > writes trite confessional *navel gazing* soap operatic poetry. That's   
   > my comment, now it's your turn.   
      
   first you're gonna have to give her something to debate.   
      
   "commentary" does not equal "critique." perhaps critique   
   is beyond your limited ability.   
      
   I guess you missed the in-depth Karla did a few days ago.   
   surely you can find it and carry on from there.   
      
   Renay   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)