XPost: alt.religion.wicca, alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.writing
XPost: alt.magick
From: dmh7@skypoint.com
Shez wrote:
> In article <42232390.4070905@skypoint.com>, Dale Houstman
> writes
>
>>
>> Rhyanon wrote:
>>
>>> Ooh, grammar lames, a sign of having no wit with which to do
>>> battle.
>>>
>>
>> Ooh, magick, a sign of having no ability to deal with the world as
>> it is.
>>
>> BTW: "wit" is made of language. If someone is so unfamiliar with
>> the English language that they repeatedly use "your" in plae of
>> "you're" then it is unlikely they know what wit is.
>
>
> Plae... Do you mean place by any chance. I suggest you see to your
> own spelling defects before you cry wolf
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you do know the
difference between an obvious typo (as caused by weak typing skills) and
an obvious lack of familiarity with the English language (as evidenced
by repeated errors)? We need no go further on that score.
>
>> Anyway, the word "grammar" is related to the word "glamor" and
>> refers to spell-casting. It is well-known that if you can't get the
>> words right, you either end up with nothing or you get eaten by
>> Beelzebub's cousin.
>
>
> Well known by who..... Magic doesn't need words, it need
> concentration, intelligence and a brain.. All of which you seem to be
> missing.
Well known by almost every person who has read about the history of
magic, and you must realize that there is a reason the word "glamor" and
"grammar" are related to one another. It didn't happen by accident. Also
- and more to the point - please do inform me how you concentrate
without the use of language, for thought IS language.
dmh
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
