[continued from previous message]   
      
    ROTHLMAO!  That's the same lie you used to tell me about PJR!   
      
      
   >> From a   
   >> linguistic standpoint, anyone can be a "potential" ally.   
   >   
   > Indeed; which is why, when you couldn't show that your Chimp was my ally   
   > or my perceived ally, you switched terms and started calling him a   
   > "potential ally."   
      
   If I'm not mistaken, we were discussing whether Jim and NancyGene were   
   *my* allies in regards to this discussion.  Why would I have attempted   
   to show that Jim was your ally?   
      
      
   >> However, as   
   >> applied to this present discussion in which Jim has not taken part (and   
   >> to the best of my knowledge is unaware of), nothing either of us says   
   >> can be realistically seen as having any effect on Jim's allegiances.   
   >   
   > As someone who bleats so much about "context", it's rather stupid of you   
   > to try to take "the present discussion" out of context, and pretend it's   
   > just an isolated thread. It's nice that I don't have to fight all three   
   > of you for once, but I am not going to pretend that the other two are   
   > still your allies, still probably lurking, and ready to jump in when you   
   > signal for help.   
      
   Good.  I won't pretend that their my allies, either.  I'm glad that we   
   were able to resolve at least this one point in an amicable manner.   
      
   --   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)