[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> (2) ignore them (in which some people might think those false claims of   
   >> yours are actually true; or   
   >> So I've had to come up with a third option:   
   >> (3) open a new thread, and refute your false claims there. This new   
   >> thread being a case in poing.   
   >   
   > And, again, this is *not* the way this happened, George.   
   >   
   > Your Donkey copy/pasted your opening statement from a conversation you   
   > were having with him into a *new* thread (link provided above).   
   >   
   > I saw your comments about me in the thread that your Donkey opened.   
   >   
   > 1) I did not break into your conversation with the Donkey.  The Donkey   
   > trolled me into it by reposting it in a separate thread.   
   >   
   > 2) Had I actually come across your actual conversation with your Donkey,   
   > I would have had every right to break into it *because it was   
   > specifically about me.*   
   >   
   > If someone is posting false statements about you on Usenet, you have   
   > every right to step in and attempt to correct them.   
   >   
   >>> Again, one can only return to the age old question of WTF is wrong with   
   >>> you, George Dance?   
   >>   
   >> Do you seriously think your attempts to second-hand Gary Gamble will be   
   >> any more   
   >> successful than your attempts to parrot Peter J Ross? You're such a   
   >> peabrain!   
   >   
   > Was that a Gary Gamble quote?   
   >   
   > As I've pointed out, Mr. Gamble had been long gone from the group when I   
   > arrived.  Since PJR repeatedly asked you the same question, I assumed   
   > that it had originated with him.   
      
   No, that was a Gary Gamble line which he pretty much used at random.   
      
   Kind of like how the "why do you lie and misrepresent so much, Michael   
   Pendragon?" comes up so often in conversation with you.   
      
   HTH and HAND.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)