[continued from previous message]   
      
   > (who left aapc after flaming from ME and Dink drove her out), Richard,   
   > and Wenceslas (whom I don't remember, period), I've got to say I don't   
   > know. Maybe they believed that your "Official Notice" that aapc had   
   > moved to facebook really was an "Official Notice". In any case since   
   > they're neither Team Monkey nor Bandar-Log, you do not speak for them.   
   >   
   >> The answer, of course, is obvious.  We wanted to be able to post in a   
   >> non-combative, friendly atmosphere where the local children wouldn't   
   >> call flood the group with spam posts and call us by childish names (like   
   >> Bobby Burro).   
   >   
   > Give those last three my email: georgedance04@yahoo.ca. If I hear from   
   > any of them that they left aapc because of my "Bobby Burro" limerick, or   
   > because they thought I was mean to the poor Burro in general, then I'll   
   > believe it.   
   >   
   >>>>>> Care to take a wild guess as to who drove Robert off of this group?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If you seriously think that he left the group because I wrote a limerick   
   >>>>> about him, then I guess you think I "drove Robert off the group." But I   
   >>>>> doubt that even you think he's that much of a snowflake that he'd run   
   >>>>> away to facebook just because someone wrote a limerick about him.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This particular limerick?  No.   
   >>>   
   >>>> What soured him on the group were your disgusting comments regarding his   
   >>>> undergoing a bone marrow transplant.   
   >>>   
   >>> So he "soured" on the group - Well, boo-hoo. That's no reason for you to   
   >>> pretend that he was driven off.   
   >>   
   >> When the actions of a group of people (in this case, Will Donkey,   
   >> "Jordy," Stinky George, and yourself) cause someone to "sour" on the   
   >> group (especially by opening attack threads about them), they have   
   >> effectively driven them away.   
   >   
   > No, that's not true at all. If someone sours on the group, they usually   
   > stay here and troll. Once again, Team Monkey et al left because they   
   > could no longer post on google, plain and simple.   
   >   
   >> I'm sure you pretend that you and Donkey (socks inclusive) didn't drive   
   >> me away, but that's exactly what you did.   
   >   
   > Of course we didn't drive you away. You stopped posting here because you   
   > had no way to post; as soon as you got one, you were back under a new   
   > sock.   
   >   
   >> When you make your presence as welcome as excrement, you are driving   
   >> people away... the non-coprophiliacs, at any rate.   
   >>   
   >>>>> Now it's my turn to ask a question: WHY are you flaming a poem I wrote   
   >>>>> and posted two years ago? How do you think your actions here are any   
   >>>>> different from mine in the thread where you were doing your "Jerk Store"   
   >>>>> laming?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Why don't you ask your Donkey?  He's the one who necroposted it.   
   >>>   
   >>> He "necroposted" the thread you were flaming me about for replying too,   
   >>> Michael Monkey Peabrain. Once again: why did you decide to do the same   
   >>> thing you were previously complaining about my doing?   
   >>   
   >> I haven't flamed your poem, George.  I haven't discussed it at all --   
   >> apart from pointing out that it was one of the many things you did here   
   >> to drive Robert away.   
   >>   
   >> Your limerick isn't funny (which is the most important thing for a   
   >> successful limerick to be). It isn't witty, and certainly isn't   
   >> profound. In fact, I can't imagine any reason for writing or posting   
   >> it, apart from the opportunity it afforded you to indulge in your   
   >> favorite pasttime of childish name-calling.   
   >   
   > As noted, our senses of humor are completely different. You think that   
   > if you call someone a "pedophile" or a "retard" that's funny or witty.   
   > (Witness your comments on your "Slurp Puppet" above.   
   >   
   > As for 'profundity', I'll repeat that it was a very incisive portrait of   
   > a type that I've encountered here repeatedly: the person who tries to   
   > fit into a writing group, not by demonstrating any good writing of his   
   > own, but by adopting an attitude of superiority to put down others'   
   > writing. (Note that when I say "others' writing" I am not referring to   
   > my own writing.)   
      
   No time to finish responding right now so...   
      
   To be Continued.   
      
   😏   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)