Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.poems    |    For the posting of poetry    |    500,551 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 499,794 of 500,551    |
|    W.Dockery to HarryLime    |
|    Re: The Psycho-epistemolgy of MMP (4/4)    |
|    10 Feb 25 09:37:00    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>>>> 2) I just googled Toohey, and here's what Sparknotes has to say: "His       >>>>> tactics frequently evoke those of Joseph Stalin, the former Russian       >>>>> revolutionary who emerged as Russia's dictator."       >>>>       >>>> Exactly. Both Toohey and Stalin were selfless servants of the people -       >>>> they had no interests of their own, but dedicated their lives to the       >>>> people. All they wanted in return was total control - not for       >>>> themselves, but for the people.       >>>       >>> I disagree. They used the people as an excuse to gain power for       >>> themselves.       >>>       >>>> Toohey was the completely selfless man - the man who wanted nothing for       >>>> himself, but only wanted the public good; and therefore wanted to break       >>>> everyone who maintained a private life, or a sense of self.       >>>       >>> Toohey was a spider. He spun pretty webs to catch flies in. But as the       >>> flies eventually found out, the pretty webs weren't to their good at       >>> all.       >>>       >>> Toohey knows that he has nothing to offer the world. He has no talents,       >>> not profound thoughts, no... anything. He therefore hates men like       >>> Wynand -- self-made movers and shakers who are *actually* bent on       >>> reshaping society for the betterment of all. Wynand is who Toohey would       >>> like to be -- but cannot.       >>>       >>> Toohey was inspired by Stalin, but from a literary standpoint, he is the       >>> grandson of Uriah Heep. He has learned how to flatter the public by       >>> constantly telling them how "humble" he is, and by explaining to them       >>> how he is happy to be their servant and has only their best interest at       >>> heart. But just a Mr. Heep was using his "humility" to gain control Mr.       >>> Wickfield and his fortune, so Ellsworth Toohey is using his professed       >>> altruism to gain the support of the masses in his bid for social power.       >>       >> Ellsworth Toohey was the "voice of the people" as he liked to remind       >> everyone.       >       > You're misremembering,       Toohey wrote a column entitled "One       > Small Voice," and would humbly remind everyone that he was just that.              I haven't read The Fountainhead in about forty years, so thanks for the       memory refresh.              >>>> I understand (Ayn Rand) just fine. I'd say that you were the one who       >>>> misunderstands her, but (considering I'm not talking to a person but a       >>>> sock) one knows where that would lead: You'd put your hands over your       >>>> ears, stamp your little foot, and cry "IKYABWAI!" again.       >>>       >>> I beg to differ       >>       >> As usual, nobody expects you to admit it.       >>       >>> Zarathustra (Nietzsche) said that Man was halfway along       >>> the bridge between Animal and Overman (and that even the Overman state       >>> was only the beginning of our journey). Roark was farther advanced       >>> along that bridge than anyone else at that time. Roark represented the       >>> Nietzschean ideal.       >>>       >>> --       >>       >> Howard Roark taught us to create our art and stand with it, don't let       >> the work be changed, either tacked on or watered them. Howard Roarke       >> wasn't afraid to blow it up, watch his creation go down in flames rather       >> than see it changed from his original vision.       >       > That's "Roark," . There's no "e" on the end of it.              I remember that now, thanks.              > Yes, Roark refused to have his artistic vision tampered with. That's       > why we artists love him (especially writers who've had editors emend       > their work without their consent).       >       > But he's still in the story to serve as a representation of the       > Nietzschean ideal. Rand was a big proponent of sledgehammer symbolism.       >       > --              That's part of Ayn Rand's charm.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca