[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>>>>>> dream construct in that regard; and like a dream construct, can be   
   >>>>>>>>>> analyzed by a psychologist, a literary critic, or even the average   
   >>>>>>>>>> reader.  Since "My Father's House" was based to a large extent on   
   your   
   >>>>>>>>>> own childhood experiences, it literally begs for a psychoanalytical   
   >>>>>>>>>> reading."   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> --   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You dispute the wisdom of the mighty Karla Rogers?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Are you trying to troll   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> No, you're the super troll, Pendragon.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I'm here for the poetry.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You're only here for the waffles.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> While you're only here to lie and misrepresent, Harry.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And so it goes.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Are you denying that you posted each of the statements listed below,   
   >>>   
   >>> As part of a discussion with others.   
   >>>   
   >>> Context matters.   
   >>   
   >> Not in this case   
   >   
   > Sure it does   
   >   
   >> How does it matter whether you were discussing the local Waffle Houses   
   >> with Zid in several different threads, or whether you launched several   
   >> Waffle-related threads on your own?   
   >>   
   >> The point is that you were discussing Waffle Houses, repeatedly, in a   
   >> newsgroup about poetry.   
   >   
   > The same can be said about you right now.   
   >   
   > 😏   
   >   
   >> Ergo, you were not here for the poetry (which you rarely discuss --   
   >   
   > That's not true, I've been discussing the poetry of Robert Creeley for a   
   > week now.   
      
   No one's been discussing Creeley's poetry, Donkey.   
      
   George Dance falsely accused NancyGene of having plagiarised one of   
   Creeley's poems... which, upon investigation, doesn't appear to have   
   ever existed.   
      
   A discussion of Creeley's poetry would entail identifying the major   
   themes that he returned to over the course of his career, his   
   significance to the history and development of poetry, and/or in-depth   
   analyses of one or more of his poems.   
      
   You've made very few attempts to discuss anyone's poetry over the years,   
   and the few that you've made have been limited to copy/pasting text from   
   Wikipedia (usually without comment).   
      
   --   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)