[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "In fact, Karla's oft-quoted adage aside, one can *never* fully   
   separate   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the two.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, all of the characters in any author's fictional   
   novel are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to represent some aspect of the author.  Every poem stems   
   from its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> author's imagination... regardless of what external persons   
   and/or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> events might have inspired it.  Every literary work is similar   
   to a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dream construct in that regard; and like a dream construct, can   
   be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> analyzed by a psychologist, a literary critic, or even the   
   average   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader.  Since "My Father's House" was based to a large extent   
   on your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> own childhood experiences, it literally begs for a   
   psychoanalytical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading."   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> You dispute the wisdom of the mighty Karla Rogers?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I'm here for the poetry.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You're only here to lie and misrepresent, Harry.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> While I've been discussing the poetry of Robert Creeley for a   
   >>>>> week now.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You've made very few attempts to discuss anyone's poetry over the years   
   >>>   
   >>> No, I've discussed dozens of poems and poets here over more than two   
   >>> decades.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I challenged you to pick a Bukowski   
   >> poem of you choice, and write at least one paragraph   
   >   
   > I posted that months ago, Harry.   
   >   
   > Look it up.   
      
   1) I'm not going to search though 1,000s of Usenet threads for a post   
   that is most likely nonexistent.   
   2) Even if such a post exists, your having taken 10 years to post it,   
   only points out how rarely you engage in poetry discussions.   
      
   You know which thread you posted it in.  You know the name of the poem   
   that you discussed.   
      
   Please repost your critical analysis of it HERE:   
      
   --   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)