Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.poems    |    For the posting of poetry    |    500,551 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 499,873 of 500,551    |
|    HarryLime to W.Dockery    |
|    Re: My Father's House / gjd (for new com    |
|    14 Feb 25 19:11:25    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>> fact that Little George calls their games "mysterious" and laments that       >>> he "never knew" them implies both that he had to spend the entire day       >>> doing chores and that he was not allowed to join the other children in       >>> their games.       >>       >> It sounds like you're repeating yourself; but maybe it's worth making       >> the same points in return. I wasn't *always* working in the garden,       >> while my friends were always working - though that's how it seemed       >> sometimes when I was working and they were playing - so that's how I had       >> Bob remember it.       >>       >>> Was George Dance also forced to work in the garden all day/denied the       >>> fun of playing with the other children? I don't know. I'm guessing       >>> that he was, because many children had gardens that they tended every       >>> day. I certainly did. I would spend an hour or so tending my garden       >>> every morning -- along with my mother and siblings. I loved my garden       >>> and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. I was also allowed to play with       >>> the local kids who would drop by on an almost daily basis.       >>       >> That sounds like a little flowerbed. Suffice it to say, both my father's       >> garden and my own were produce gardens, where we grew virtually all our       >> own vegetables. So it was a much bigger task, which took me at least a       >> couple of hours a day (and pretty much every day when school was out);       >> and again, like you, I could not simply drop everything and go off to       >> play during that time. There was plenty of times though that my friends       >> were doing work and my sister and I were the ones playing; and even more       >> when we all had free time and could play together.       >>       >>> Little George's next stanza opens with the line "That room's all       >>> changed" implying either that the garden is a room, or that he is taking       >>> the reader on a walking tour of his childhood house. This appears to be       >>> another problem caused by switching the kitchen and garden stanzas'       >>> position in the narrative.       >>       >> The "problem" seems to be caused by your either: (1) not realizing the       >> speaker could have been looking "outside" through a window; or (2) your       >> constant attempts, in your guise as literary critic, to find errors in       >> the poem. The garden stanza is deliberately s5 (the mid stanza of the       >> poem), for reasons I'll have to explain.       >>       >> There are two stanzas where the D line is a rhymes perfectly with the       >> A-B lines; s5 and s9. The reason that the failure of the others to       >> rhyme, as I'm sure I've explained to you before, is to subliminally       >> reinforce the idea that Bob is having trouble completing his thoughts.       >> Whereas in s5 and s9 he does bring his thoughts to a conclusion; in s5       >> he realizes that (IHO) he's been deprived as a child, and in s9 he       >> realizes that he wants to be rid of those memories.       >>       >>> I'm assuming that it's the living room,       >>> although Little George neither specifies nor gives us any other clue       >>> than that it contains a chair on which he is forbidden to sit.       >>       >> Actually, the room contains one chair in which Bob is allowed to sit.       >> But, yes, it's the living room. I don't know how things were in your       >> home, but in mine and most of the one's I've encountered, the living       >> room was where the family sat together. (In Britain it's actually called       >> the "sitting room").       >>> IIRC,       >>> George Dance stated that while he was also barred from using the living       >>> room furniture, the parental description of boys as "filthy things" was       >>> derived from the life of another boy that he knew.       >>       >> There was in fact only one place for the children to sit in my family's       >> living room, though it was a couch (for all the children), not a       >> separate chair.       >>       >>> Last stop on the tour is the bedroom. Little George is sent there after       >>> dinner every night where he feels as if he is trapped within a tomb --       >>> alone and forced to pass the time quietly playing by himself. "Each       >>> night" at 9pm, Little George was forced to turn out the lights,       >>       >> Yes, I was, but "Each night" is a bit of an exaggeration; that was       >> actually each night in which I had school (or something equally       >> important) the next day. On weekends and in the summer, I could stay up       >> later, and go outside after dinner until dark, and that was all free       >> time. Once again, if I were relating an autobiography (which it looks       >> like you've forced me to do) I'd have mentioned those exceptions, but as       >> I was not recounting my memories but Bob's, I had him exaggerate.       >>       >>> and lie       >>> face down in bed with his pajama pants pulled down and his bare behind       >>> awaiting his father's belt. George Dance hasn't said that this bedtime       >>> ritual occurred on a daily basis in real life, but has intimated that       >>> the "spankings" (which he refused to call "whippings" even though the       >>> blows were delivered with a belt) frequently took place.       >>       >> Well, being "whipped" (to use your preferred term though there was no       >> whip involved) took place too often for my liking, but I certainly       >> wouldn't call it a "bedtime ritual" (which does make it sound like it       >> happened on some fixed schedule irrespective of how I behaved). And Bob       >> clearly states that that happened only "some nights".       >>       >>> So, pretty much the entire "flashback" portion of the poem was based on       >>> real events from George Dance's childhood. Some of the events may have       >>> been slightly exaggerated, or enhanced, for dramatic purposes, and one       >>> item was interpolated from another boy's stories about his own       >>> childhood.       >>       >> No, I did not say I got the expression "boys can be such filthy things"       >> from another boy's account to me. IIRC, it was just something I read       >> somewhere. I did a lot of reading as a child and as a young adult, and a       >> lot of the speakers' "memories" and other thoughts use what I've read       >> (and simply imagined) as well as what I directly experienced.       >>       >>> This leaves the "modern" portions of the narrative which       >>> frame the flashback portion.       >>       >> I don't think you can separate the poem like that. Bob's actions, and       >> Bob's memories, are fully integrated - you cannot separate the memories       >> from the fact that Bob's remembering them.       >>       >>> In the modern portion, it is strongly       >>> implied (by George Dance's own explanation) that the speaker is       >>> receiving some form of psychiatric care, and is probably residing in a       >>> mental hospital.       >>       >> I thought that was an interesting touch from the beginning, though (as I       >> made it clear in previous explanations) there is no reason to think,       >> from the fact that Bob was in the house with permission, that he was in       >> a mental hospital or that he was under psychiatric care. His mental       >> state is obviously disturbed - as noted, he has difficulty staying on       >> one subject and drawing conclusions - but I think those could follow       >> from the situation (he's experiencing childhood memories that he'd       >> rather not) rather than his own mental state.       >>       >>> He has permission to leave the grounds during the day,       >>> and (unrealistically) to visit his childhood home that is now occupied       >>> by another family.       >>       >> Yes, the idea that someone confined to a mental hospital would be given       >> a day pass to go off on a road trip by himself is very "unrealistic" and       >> (while I liked it being as possibility) it's not a very logical       >> possibility. I believe you went for it because you wanted to and went on              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca