[continued from previous message]
>>> Of course Pickles was defending a NAMBLA member who had sex underaged
>>> boys (Ginsberg)
>>
>> Again, that's a lie and a misrepresentation.
>
> Not at all. Pickles admitting having gone to NAMBLA meetings, NAMBLA
> conventions, being friends with NAMBLA members, and having taken NAMBLA
> members to dinner, having discussed NAMBLA with them, and found them and
> their ideas to be perfectly acceptable.
>
> Pickles also boasted of having statutorily raped two 14-year old girls
> (probably a lie, but his boast speaks volumes about his views on the
> subject), and supported abolishing the legal age.
>
>>
>> Allen Ginsberg was never known to have sex with anyone younger than
>> 18-19 and that was just one young guy who was in love with Allen
>> Ginsberg.
>>
>> This was all posted and archived here a dozen times in 2017-18.
>
> Wikipedia and other web sources say differently.
>
>
>>
>> > Pickering.>
>>
>>>>>> Jim Senetto's homophobia and Antisemitism was the cause, basically.
>>>>
>>>> Jim Senetto was constantly making anti gay remarks to Pickering, Zod,
>>>> even me.
>>>
>>> You really don't understand what words like anti-gay homophobic mean.
>>> Jim made gay jokes about you for the same reasons that I did: your own
>>> homophobia caused you to launch into a hissyfit on the topic.
>>
>> No, I simply corrected the lies and misrepresentations and set the
>> record straight, and will continue to.
>>
>>> Homophobia was your Michael Cooke of 2018
>>
>> The name is Michael Cook, no e at the end.
>>
>>>> He also joined in the jeering of 'fake Jew" against Stephan Pickering.
>>
>> Autocorrect typo fixed.
>>
>> Jeering not meeting.
>>
>>> if someone is going to cry "Antisemite!" each time
>>> you say anything about him, it's certainly reasonable to point out that
>>> he isn't even Jewish.
>>>
>>> Again, Pickles claims of being Jewish were a joke. He wanted to be like
>>> Bob Dylan, but he didn't want to take the time to study with a Rabbi, or
>>> to undergo a circumcision (who does?). So he bought himself a yarmulke
>>> and proclaimed himself a Jew.
>>
>> People do concert.
>>
>> My late friend Dan Barfield converted to becoming a Jew when he married
>> his first wife Judy, at the request of her parents, for example.
>
> If it was a Halachal conversion, he did it under the auspices of a
> Rabbi, had a circumcision and was immersed in a Mikvah.
>
> If he self-converted like Pickles, it didn't count.
>
>
>>
>>>>>>> Well, allow me to refresh your memory. Jim and Stephan first got into
>>>>>>> flamewars after you formed Team Monkey with him and NastyGoon (NG), a
>>>>>>> Pickering
>>>>>>> troll.
>>
>> George Dance nailed it ^^^
>
> There is not team, Donkey. Never has been, never will be
>
>
>>>> Nancy Gene obsessively stalked Stephan Pickering here from the Bob Dylan
>>>> newsgroup and began attacking Pickering here.
>>>
>>> No one has ever denied that. NancyGene obviously didn't like the man.
>>
>>
>> Or that Nancy Gene stalked Stephan Pickering here to continue her troll
>> attacks.
>>
>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>> they (NG's preferred pronoun) would write trollpoems about Stephan.
>>>>
>>>> That's really the only interest Nancy Gene had at the time, stalking and
>>>> attacking Stephan Pickering.
>>>
>>>
>>> That was almost 10 years ago
>>
>> I'm fine with that.
>>
>> Let's move on.
>>
>>>>>>> result would be Stephan jumping into the Sampler, which would result in
>>>>>>> JIm
>>>>>>> flaming him and others (for example, Richard Oakley) also being turned
>>>>>>> against Jim. I doubt that either Jim nor Stephan realized that you were
>>>>>>> manipulating them for that outcome.
>>>>
>>>> Pendragon sure had the feeble minded Jim Senetto in his control.
>>>
>>> Jim isn't here
>>
>> Good riddance.
>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, that's exactly what Pendragon's agenda turned out to be.
>>>>
>>>> By the time Google Groups went under last year that's all Pendragon wS
>>>> doing, posting his malicious lies and misrepresentations.
>>>
>>>
>>> No... when Google Groups went under, I was busy reestablishing AAPC
>>
>> alt.arts.pietry.comments is a Usenet newsgroup, not a Facebook group.
>>
>> HERE is where a.a.p.c. is and will remain.
>
> But what have you done here?
>
>
>>
>>>>> The proof of one's agenda is in what one d
>>>>
>>>> And you've shown yourself to be a sleazy malicious troll for almost a
>>>> decade now, Pendragon.
>>>
>>> No... created an online community
>>
>> Good for you.
>>
>> Go there.
>>
>> 😏
>>
>>> I don't think that's anyone's idea of a "sleazy malicious troll."
>>
>> We can show them the Usenet newsgroup archives.
>>
>> So what really happened at the 1950s newsgroup for the other regulars to
>> drive you away so permanently?
>
> I've told you, Donkey. We started off on the wrong foot, and it
> escalated from there.
>
> I left when the discussions became rehashes of material we'd gone over
> before. I had nothing further to learn from them.
>
>
>>> What have you done for AAPC?
>>
>> Just reading and posting poetry, which is all that's needed or expected.
>
> Since the only ones posting are you and sometimes Rachel, you haven't
> got a lot to read.
>
>>>>> Let us now turn to Matthew 7:16-20
>>>>> (King James Version):
>>>>>
>>>>> 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns,
>>>>> or figs of thistles?
>>>>>
>>>>> 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree
>>>>> bringeth forth evil fruit.
>>>>>
>>>>> 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree
>>>>> bring forth good fruit.
>>>>>
>>>>> 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast
>>>>> into the fire.
>>>>>
>>>>> 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Shall we compare fruits?
>>>>
>>>> I've never been a fan of Michael Pendragon poetry, sorry.
>>>
>>> Thank God!
>>
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> 😏
>>
>>>>> I am publishing an AAPC poetry journal featuring award-winning poets.
>>>>
>>>> Can you say vanity press?
>>>
>>> A vanity press charges a "reading" or "submission" fee.
>>
>> Do you pay in contributors copies?
>
> Almost. I don't receive any money for them. They're sold at cost.
So... no.
>>>>>>> After Jim and Stephan became engaged in a prolonged flamewar, both on
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> off the Sampler, the second thing you did was start flooding the group
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> a nasty, libellous document that NG had written.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh yes, the last resort, flood the newsgroup with your lies and
>>>> misrepresentations.
>>>
>>> There was no such "libellous[sic]" document
>>
>> George Dance saw it differently.
>
> He certainly spelled it differently.
>
>>
>>> "There is no 'fact' of 'statutory rape'. 'Morality' -- like
>>> 'gnosticism', 'god', haKodesh Barukh hu, 'mysticism' -- are NOT
>>> definable, and for you to keep transposing your stultifying
>>> proto-fascism onto others is not accepted by me."
>>>
>>> "The 'incest taboo' cannot be predicated on known biology, but is a
>>> human sociopolitical category."
>>>
>>> "Shalom & Erev tov, everyone...PaederastDeSock knows nothing of the
>>> mother of my 2 children now in Yisra'el. Neither does NaziQueene whose
>>> psychopathy is documented here. He is attempting to equate '14' with
>>> immaturity, or infancy. This is how he mangles reality. They were adults
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
