[continued from previous message]   
      
   I'm excited by the idea, and view it as a challenge that should be   
   highly enjoyable.   
      
      
   >>>> Context Matters: The degree to which a lifted line is considered   
   >>>> plagiarism can depend on its context. A very common phrase might be less   
   >>>> problematic, but a distinctive line, especially one that carries   
   >>>> significant meaning within its original poem, is more clearly   
   >>>> plagiarism.   
   >>>   
   >>> Four paragraphs down, Gemini AI is finally saying that lifting a line   
   >>> may or may not be considered "plagiarism".   
   >>   
   >> As Gemini says, "Context Matters."  That's something I fear you will   
   >> never understand.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> Intentionality: Whether the plagiarism was intentional or unintentional   
   >>>> doesn't necessarily absolve the writer of responsibility. While   
   >>>> unintentional plagiarism might be viewed more leniently, it still   
   >>>> constitutes a misrepresentation of authorship.     
   >>>   
   >>> "Unintentional plagiarism" opens up a whole 'nother can of worms. Is a   
   >>> poet supposed to do a google search for every line in his poem to make   
   >>> sure it was never used on the web? If a web search does find an exact   
   >>> match, how can it be proven whether the poet ever read it or heard of   
   >>> it, or not?   
   >>   
   >> Of course not.  Unintentional plagiarism isn't a crime, as there was   
   >> never any intent to steal someone else's work.   
   >>   
   >> However, the unintentionally plagiarized work will suffer from both its   
   >> relationship to, and in comparison with, the original.   
   >>   
   >> But the odds of that happening are slim.  Borel's monkeys, after all,   
   >> were of an infinite number.   
   >>   
   >>>> Exceptions and Nuances:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Allusion and Homage: Poets sometimes allude to or pay homage to other   
   >>>> poets by incorporating lines or phrases into their work. However, this   
   >>>> is usually done with some form of acknowledgment or in a way that   
   >>>> clearly signals the reference.   
   >>>   
   >>> So allusion is not plagiarism, even when there is no attribution.   
   >>   
   >> I didn't think it possible, but George Dance just paraphrased something   
   >> correctly!   
   >>   
   >> Go George!   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>> Parody and Pastiche: These forms of writing intentionally borrow from   
   >>>> other works for satirical or artistic purposes. In these cases, the   
   >>>> borrowing is usually obvious and part of the artistic intent.   
   >>>   
   >>> So pastiche is not plagiarism, even when there is no attribution.   
   >>   
   >> George is on a roll!   
   >>   
   >>>> Public Domain: Works that are in the public domain are not subject to   
   >>>> copyright restrictions.   
   >>>   
   >>> There is no "public domain" exception for plagiarism. If it's plagiarism   
   >>> to use a line from a copyrighted work, it's plagiarism to use a line   
   >>> from a public domain work.   
   >>   
   >> Too bad.  I thought you were going to get three in a row.   
   >>   
   >> The quoted passage was not talking about "plagiarism," George.  It   
   >> specifically said "copyright restrictions."  These are not the same   
   >> thing.   
   >>   
   >>>> In most cases, using another poet's line without attribution is   
   >>>> considered plagiarism and is unethical."   
   >>>   
   >>> Maybe. Since Gemini AI doesn't provide any data on cases, this sounds   
   >>> like pure speculation.   
   >>   
   >> There's no "maybe" about it, George.   
   >>   
   >> Most poets, most writers, and most people in general consider it to be   
   >> plagiarism.   
   >   
   > Poetry such as my poem "Karma Bombs" used by Michael Cook without   
   > attribution, for example.   
      
   You're not only still obsessed with Mr. Cook, but you're a little Donkey   
   one note regarding it.   
      
   --   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)