[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is), is simply incorrect.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My previous post explains why:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "In fact, Karla's oft-quoted adage aside, one can *never*   
   fully separate   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the two.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, all of the characters in any author's fictional   
   novel are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to represent some aspect of the author.  Every poem   
   stems from its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> author's imagination... regardless of what external persons   
   and/or   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events might have inspired it.  Every literary work is   
   similar to a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dream construct in that regard; and like a dream construct,   
   can be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> analyzed by a psychologist, a literary critic, or even the   
   average   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader.  Since "My Father's House" was based to a large   
   extent on your   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own childhood experiences, it literally begs for a   
   psychoanalytical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You dispute the wisdom of the mighty Karla Rogers?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm here for the poetry.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You're only here to lie and misrepresent, Harry.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> While I've been discussing the poetry of Robert Creeley for a   
   >>>>>>> week now.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You've made very few attempts to discuss anyone's poetry over the years   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No, I've discussed dozens of poems and poets here over more than two   
   >>>>> decades.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I challenged you to pick a Bukowski   
   >>>> poem of you choice, and write at least one paragraph   
   >>>   
   >>> I posted that months ago, Harry.   
   >>>   
   >>> Look it up.   
   >>   
   >> 1) I'm not going to search though 1,000s of Usenet threads   
   >   
   > I've bumped it to the top for you several times, Pendragon.   
   >   
   > Apparently you didn't want to see it because it proves you wrong and we   
   > all know you're not good with being proven wrong.   
      
   I don't open 99% of your necrobumped threads, Donkey.   
      
   Instead of bumping it, just post a link in this thread.   
      
   --   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)