From: ted@loft.tnolan.com   
      
   In article <10ljc42$fg8$1@panix2.panix.com>,   
   Scott Dorsey  wrote:   
   >So, given the worries about F&SF, I picked up the latest copy at my local   
   >Barnes and Noble, along with the latest Asimov's.  Both seem to be   
   >published now by Must Read Magazines.  There were two copies of F&SF at   
   >the store and both were pretty ripped up, so I got the better of the two.   
   >   
   >I haven't got a copy of any SF magazine since the Covid shutdown and I   
   >was shocked at how poor the physical quality was.  The paper on the   
   >covers is much thinner and poorly-made than in previous years, and the   
   >printing was very uneven with some streaks of very light printing and some   
   >streaks of very heavy printing, like a badly-worn and poorly-adjusted   
   >web press.  Nothing was illegible but some pages took some studying.   
   >   
      
   See, well-printed & well-bound *is* important :-)   
   --   
   columbiaclosings.com   
   What's not in Columbia anymore..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)