XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   From: Kenito@Benito.Het   
      
   On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:57:01 -0500, Attila  wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:57:25 -0800, Kenito Benito   
   > in alt.atheism with message-id   
   ><1lgqkklp2fnq963ugp7prjnrjkqre5rq53@4ax.com> wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 16:52:23 -0500, Attila  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>[...]   
   >>   
   >>>U.S. deportation (or removal) laws, primarily under the   
   >>>Immigration and Nationality Act, allow for the removal of   
   >>>non-citizens for reasons like unlawful presence, visa   
   >>>violations, or criminal offenses (e.g., controlled   
   >>>substances, weapons). The process involves removal   
   >>>proceedings (with an immigration judge) or faster expedited   
   >>>removal for certain undocumented individuals.   
   >>>   
   >>>Note "unlawful presence" is the first thing mentioned.   
   >>>   
   >>>Immigration laws do require the deportation of illegals and   
   >>>nothing more than being illegal is required.   
   >>   
   >>     According to what you quote above, "...allow for the removal of   
   >>non-citizens for reasons like unlawful presence, visa violations, or   
   >>criminal offenses..."   
   >>     Allow, not require.   
   >   
   >But you agree it is allowed.   
   >   
      
        I've never claimed, or even suggested, otherwise. You claim it's   
   required, then destroy your argument by proving it is not required.   
   You're not very good at debating.   
      
   >>     But due process is REQUIRED under the Constitution. You may   
   >>disagree as much as you like. But until a SCOTUS ruling overrules the   
   >>current active ruling, or an amendment removing due process is   
   >>ratified, it stands.   
   >   
   >SCOTUS can modify any law or previous ruling it desires.  It   
   >simply cannot make new laws.   
   >   
      
        Current ruling is due process is for everyone within the boarders   
   of the U.S. You've already made it clear you think Constitution law   
   should be ignored (unless you are trolling).   
      
   >>     Yes, there are very limited exceptions. As of the time I write   
   >>this, you've offered NOTHING that would even suggest any of those   
   >>exceptions have been met.   
   >   
   >If you agree deportation is allowed there is no reason it   
   >should not be done if all other conditions are met.   
   >   
      
        So now you're in favor of a deportation hearing to establish if   
   the person is illegal or not.   
        You jump around way too much to be serious.   
      
   >The only due process required is to establish the current   
   >status of the individual involved.   
   >   
      
        But you've made it clear you don't want that. You want them   
   deported simply because ICE arrested them.   
      
   >This all boils down to something very simple.  You want   
   >deportations stopped and every illegal to stay in the   
   >country.   
      
        Your lying is not the benefit you believe it to be.   
        Care to explain why you think lying is going to help you? Don't   
   waste time with avoidance. Answer the question, and answer honestly.   
      
   >You probably want more of them to come here.   
   >   
   >I want every illegal to be deported as soon as possible   
   >without exception for any reason.   
      
        You want due process ignored. In your mind, the mere accusation   
   is proof of guilt. You have made this clear in numerous posts. I can   
   provide the MIDs, if you suddenly can't recall what you posted.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)