XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   From: Kenito@Benito.Het   
      
   On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:50:48 -0500, Attila  wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:58:52 -0800, Kenito Benito   
   > in alt.atheism with message-id   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:19:11 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>[...]   
   >>   
   >>>>I am not interested in a discussion about past events since   
   >>>>there is little that can be done to change them.  Although   
   >>>>IIRC Cesar Milan self deported back across the border and   
   >>>>reentered legally.   
   >>>   
   >>>Yet we are told that if you're found here illegally, you may not enter   
   >>>legally in the future.   
   >>   
   >>     Some can. A first offence is a misdemeanor, so legal entry in the   
   >>future is possible. Difficult, but possible.   
   >>   
   >>>Again, if you don't know the law, stop telling us what it is.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>     Attila likes to declare what the law is, until called on it.   
   >>Then, suddenly, it's, in effect, "I don't know what the law actually   
   >>is."   
   >   
   >I know the generalization but I will not be dragged into   
   >arguing the fine points of any particular case or   
   >circumstance.   
   >   
   >Federal law provides for the deportation of anyone here who   
   >does not legal status and I advocate those laws should be   
   >applied as soon as possible and every person here illegally   
   >should be immediately deported without exception.   
   >   
      
        Again you PROVE you want the US Constitution ignored.   
      
   >I support ICE in their efforts - they know more about it   
   >than I do and they are trying to accomplish what I desire to   
   >see done.   
      
        You honestly desire the violation of Federal and Constitutional   
   law? Wow.   
        Please tell me you're merely trolling.   
      
   >   
   >>     One doesn't need to be a lawyer to know the law. In the US,   
   >>anyone with an interest and ability may study any and all laws   
   >>applicable in the US.   
   >   
   >But those laws frequently are meaningless until they are   
   >interpreted by a court.  That is why case law far exceeds   
   >statutory law in volume and why legal documents contain so   
   >much boilerplate phraseology.   
   >   
      
        I will enjoy researching the valid cites you will offer for your   
   claim.   
      
   >The basic concept of deporting illegals is well established   
   >as is their status when they did not enter legally,   
   >overstayed their permission to be in the country, of for   
   >some other reason are no longer qualified to remain.   
      
        Since you desire the law be violated, I don't understand why   
   you're upset about illegal immigration. How do you rationalize such   
   hypocrisy? Don't waste time with avoidance and/or diversion. Explain   
   how you can hold such opposing positions.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)