XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.conspiracy, alt.atheism   
   From: Kenito@Benito.Het   
      
   On Fri, 26 Dec 2025 05:10:47 -0500, Attila  wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 26 Dec 2025 00:47:04 -0800, Kenito Benito   
   > in alt.atheism with message-id   
   ><7oiskk5n1fuohotpurnrset6msi3anqcpj@4ax.com> wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:50:48 -0500, Attila  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:58:52 -0800, Kenito Benito   
   >>> in alt.atheism with message-id   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:19:11 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>[...]   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>I am not interested in a discussion about past events since   
   >>>>>>there is little that can be done to change them.  Although   
   >>>>>>IIRC Cesar Milan self deported back across the border and   
   >>>>>>reentered legally.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Yet we are told that if you're found here illegally, you may not enter   
   >>>>>legally in the future.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     Some can. A first offence is a misdemeanor, so legal entry in the   
   >>>>future is possible. Difficult, but possible.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Again, if you don't know the law, stop telling us what it is.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     Attila likes to declare what the law is, until called on it.   
   >>>>Then, suddenly, it's, in effect, "I don't know what the law actually   
   >>>>is."   
   >>>   
   >>>I know the generalization but I will not be dragged into   
   >>>arguing the fine points of any particular case or   
   >>>circumstance.   
   >>>   
   >>>Federal law provides for the deportation of anyone here who   
   >>>does not legal status and I advocate those laws should be   
   >>>applied as soon as possible and every person here illegally   
   >>>should be immediately deported without exception.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>     Again you PROVE you want the US Constitution ignored.   
   >   
   >No, there is nothing wrong with my statement.  The purpose   
   >of due process is to legally determine if a person is here   
   >legally or illegally.  If he is found to be here illegally   
   >it would follow he would be immediately deported as per   
   >federal law.  Nothing says he is illegal but should be   
   >allowed to stay.   
   >   
      
        Your first argument was that NO due process should be permitted.   
   You claimed (LIED) that it is for citizens only.   
      
   >>   
   >>>I support ICE in their efforts - they know more about it   
   >>>than I do and they are trying to accomplish what I desire to   
   >>>see done.   
   >>   
   >>     You honestly desire the violation of Federal and Constitutional   
   >>law? Wow.   
   >>     Please tell me you're merely trolling.   
   >   
   >I support the enforcement of federal law, which is what ICE   
   >is doing.  It is why they were hired and it is a requirement   
   >of their employment.   
   >   
      
        ICE isn't the issue. You keep trying to divert the discussion to   
   ICE. ICE is a law enforcement agency. It does not determine if someone   
   is here legally or not. That is what the courts do in a deportation   
   hearing.   
        Please cease trying to divert to advance your trolling.   
      
   >Do you think ICE is mandated to break the law?   
   >   
      
        No such claim is made, or even implied. Again you attempt to   
   divert.   
        You're trolling. It's the only way you can continue to present   
   yourself as so uneducated.   
      
   [Snip the remainder. You've lost me as your troll catch.]   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)