home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.tv      The boob tube, its history, and past and      233,998 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 232,434 of 233,998   
   BTR1701 to All   
   Re: Mamdani: White People are Going to H   
   06 Jan 26 02:47:21   
   
   From: atropos@mac.com   
      
   On Jan 5, 2026 at 4:37:02 PM PST, "shawn"    
   wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:36:54 -0500, Rhino   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>  On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino"    
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>  On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>    Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition   
   >>>>> private   
   >>>>>    property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to   
   >>>>>  commercial   
   >>>>>    residential buildings but individual homes as well.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have   
   a   
   >>>>>    different relationship to property than the one we currently have."   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you   
   >>>>> and make   
   >>>>>    it a public resource.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/   
   id/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC   
   >>>>> might   
   >>>>>    have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the   
   >>>>>    Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea   
   >>>>> Weaver   
   >>>>>    will likely have a different relationship with her job than she   
   currently   
   >>>>>    has.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>  In the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon   
   >>>>  found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather   
   >>>>  poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families   
   >>>>  became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families   
   >>>>  assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two   
   >>>>  and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with   
   >>>>  everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned   
   >>>>  times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just   
   >>>>  a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the   
   >>>>  authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after   
   >>>>  Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment   
   >>>>  blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.   
   >>>>  These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its   
   >>>>  former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie   
   >>>>  blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.   
   >>>   
   >>>  Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th   
   as   
   >>>  well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial   
   element   
   >>>  to them.   
   >>>   
   >>>  And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the   
   >>> true   
   >>>  purpose of the 2nd Amendment.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >> Here's hoping!   
   >>   
   >> I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary   
   >> family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think   
   >> Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the   
   >> chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean   
   >> the lawyers for the city!   
   >   
   > That's because it would never happen. What might, but probably won't,   
   > happen is to use the places that are unoccupied as temporary housing.   
   > Imagine empty office buildings or other places that may have set empty   
   > for years being re purposed.   
      
   If I own a house and I want, for whatever reason, to leave it empty for a   
   period of time, that's none of the government's goddam business. It's *my*   
   house. I can rent it, live in it, leave it empty, let my kid stay in it for   
   free, or bulldoze it to the ground. Mam-fuckin'-dani doesn't get a say.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca