home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.tv      The boob tube, its history, and past and      233,998 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 232,505 of 233,998   
   Adam H. Kerman to atropos@mac.com   
   Re: Gotta love lawyers, international ed   
   08 Jan 26 04:35:41   
   
   From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   BTR1701   wrote:   
   >On Jan 7, 2026 at 7:52:33 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""  wrote:   
   >   
   >> BTR1701  wrote:   
   >>> Jan 7, 2026 at 4:23:37 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> Michael Kelly, professor with several sub specialties in international   
   >>>> law, explained what was wrong with Maduro's capture in terms of   
   >>>> international law. He was a guest on C-SPAN Washington Journal 1/7/2026.   
   >>   
   >>>> First, Trump was blowing up boats, claiming narco-terroris. That was   
   >>>> war, not law enforcement. No evidence was preserved. No one was captured   
   >>>> to be put on trial.   
   >>   
   >>>> If there's a war, then Maduro was a legitimate military target as he   
   >>>> gives orders to the military.   
   >>   
   >>>> But... if Trump kills him in an act of war, then that means Trump   
   >>>> recognized him as legitimate head of state.   
   >>   
   >>> Why? We kill a lot of enemy citizens during wars. Doesn't mean we believe   
   >>> they're all heads of state.   
   >>   
   >>>> Capturing him and putting him on trial is a violation of international   
   >>>> law.   
   >>   
   >>> Isn't that what they did with the Nazis at Nuremberg?   
   >>   
   >> He's saying specifically that a head of state is immune from prosecution   
   >> by a foreign government.   
   >   
   >He thinks that if the Allies had captured Hitler, that he wouldn't have been   
   >on trial at Nuremberg also?   
      
   I have no clue. Nothing he said made any sense.   
      
   >>  Killing him as an act of war is not a violatiom   
   >> of international law. Putting him on trial is.   
   >>   
   >> It makes no sense.   
   >>   
   >> I've never studied what law Nazis were charged under.   
   >>   
   >>>> But now he gets American justice and might be acquitted!   
   >>   
   >>>> In other words, fair trial is a violation of international law. The   
   >>>> professor implied that killing him as an act of war would not have   
   >>>> violated international law.   
   >>   
   >>>> Frank, I have a sick headache.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca