From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 1/10/2026 9:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Jan 10, 2026 at 1:36:10 PM PST, "moviePig" wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 1/10/2026 2:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>> On Jan 10, 2026 at 8:09:24 AM PST, "moviePig" wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 1/9/2026 11:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>> On Jan 9, 2026 at 7:38:39 PM PST, "moviePig"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 1/9/2026 7:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Jan 9, 2026 at 2:21:03 PM PST, "moviePig" wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 1/9/2026 3:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Jan 9, 2026 at 12:29:50 PM PST, "moviePig"    
   nobody@nowhere.com>   
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2026 2:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> The United Arab Emirates announced that they will cut   
   government   
   >>>>>>>>>>> funding for   
   >>>>>>>>>>> citizens who wish to study in the United Kingdom out of   
   fear that   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Emirati   
   >>>>>>>>>>> students may be radicalized by Muslim Brotherhood   
   members on British   
   >>>>>>>>>>> campuses.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> An Arab state now considers Britain such a dangerous   
   hotbed of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Islamist   
   >>>>>>>>>>> radicalization that it affects their national security.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Specifically, the UAE seems to be targeting the Muslim   
   >>>>>>>>>> Brotherhood, who   
   >>>>>>>>>> seeks the ascendancy of a pure Islamist state ...including   
   in the UAE.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Which the UK government is literally doing nothing about.   
   Hell,   
   >>>>>>>>> they're   
   >>>>>>>>> intentionally and actively making the problem worse with   
   their mass   
   >>>>>>>>> 3rd-world   
   >>>>>>>>> immigration policies.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Unless the Brotherhood advocates illegality, I don't see how   
   the UK can   
   >>>>>>>> censure without appearing to censor. (I suspect the UAE   
   doesn't care.)   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The same way they're prosecuting all the white native Brits for   
   >>>>>>> tweets and   
   >>>>>>> comments, claiming they "foment racial hatred" or "cause   
   offense".   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> There are imams directly calling for the overthrow of the UK   
   government   
   >>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>> the killing of Jews and Christians and they're left alone. Not   
   even a   
   >>>>>>> visit   
   >>>>>>> from the police, let alone a prosecution or deportation.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> But if you're a native Brit and you say, "Fuck Hamas!" on   
   Facebook,   
   >>>>>>> you're   
   >>>>>>> thrown in prison. Hell, some native Brits have been arrested   
   merely for   
   >>>>>>> saying   
   >>>>>>> they like bacon. But the Muslims? If you report them for far more   
   >>>>>>> serious   
   >>>>>>> things like threatening your life, let alone offending you, the   
   police   
   >>>>>>> drop   
   >>>>>>> it   
   >>>>>>> the moment they realize the suspect is brown, migrant, or Muslim.   
   >>>>>>> They'll   
   >>>>>>> literally tell you, "Sorry, those people are protected."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So as not to compare apples to oranges, it'd be helpful to see   
   (which I   
   >>>>>> haven't) a wriggle-free instance equivalent to "Fuck Judaism" being   
   >>>>>> punished while "Fuck Islam" isn't. Both seem unequivocally hate   
   speech.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Except the case in question wasn't "Fuck Islam", it was "Fuck   
   Hamas". A   
   >>>>> group   
   >>>>> which the UK government itself designates a terrorist organization.   
   So   
   >>>>> here   
   >>>>> we   
   >>>>> have the UK locking up one of its own citizens for insulting a bunch   
   of   
   >>>>> terrorists. It's literally illegal to hurt the feelings of terrorists   
   >>>>> in the   
   >>>>> UK.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You write:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "There are imams directly calling for the overthrow of the UK   
   >>>> government and the killing of Jews and Christians and they're left   
   >>>> alone. Not even a visit from the police, let alone a prosecution or   
   >>>> deportation."   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That does sound clearly illegal. Do you have a reputable cite?   
   >>>   
   >>> Read up on the case of Alaa Abd el-Fattah.   
   >>   
   >> From Wiki:   
   >>   
   >> Abd El-Fattah wrote "Looking at the tweets now – the ones that were   
   >> not completely twisted out of their meaning – I do understand how   
   >> shocking and hurtful they are, and for that I unequivocally apologise".   
   >   
   > Did Lucy Connelly get the chance to apologize for her tweets and just move on   
   > with her life? Nope. She got dumped in the clink for two years.   
   >   
   > But ol' Abd, he gets to just say, "Whoops! Sorry!" and the UK government   
   looks   
   > the other way.   
   >   
   > And if you believe that apology is sincere and he no longer feels that way, I   
   > have some bridges you might be interested in purchasing.   
      
   I allow that someone seems to have "made an example" of her. Likewise,   
   the Muslim guy (whose apology was perhaps more a "bending of the knee")   
   seems to have benefited as different "example".   
      
      
   >> He said that tweets allegedly showing homophobia and Holocaust denial   
   >> were satires of such attitudes, and that he had fought for Egypt's LGBT   
   >> and religious minority communities. The Government considered his   
   >> apology "fairly fulsome".   
   >>   
   >> Obviously, his public contrition is unconvincing. But it's enough to   
   >> muddy the waters for a government ostensibly prioritizing freedoms.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|