From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 1/11/2026 4:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Jan 10, 2026 at 7:38:11 PM PST, "moviePig"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 1/10/2026 9:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>   On Jan 10, 2026 at 1:36:10 PM PST, "moviePig"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   On 1/10/2026 2:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>     On Jan 10, 2026 at 8:09:24 AM PST, "moviePig"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>     On 1/9/2026 11:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>       On Jan 9, 2026 at 7:38:39 PM PST, "moviePig"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>       On 1/9/2026 7:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>         On Jan 9, 2026 at 2:21:03 PM PST, "moviePig"   
   >>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>         Unless the Brotherhood advocates illegality, I don't see how   
   >>>>>>>>>> the UK can   
   >>>>>>>>>>         censure without appearing to censor.  (I suspect the UAE   
   >>>>>>>>>> doesn't care.)   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>         The same way they're prosecuting all the white native Brits   
   for   
   >>>>>>>>>   tweets and   
   >>>>>>>>>         comments, claiming they "foment racial hatred" or "cause   
   offense".   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>         There are imams directly calling for the overthrow of the UK   
   >>>>>>>>> government   
   >>>>>>>>>     and   
   >>>>>>>>>         the killing of Jews and Christians and they're left alone.   
   Not even a   
   >>>>>>>>>     visit   
   >>>>>>>>>         from the police, let alone a prosecution or deportation.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>         But if you're a native Brit and you say, "Fuck Hamas!" on   
   Facebook,   
   >>>>>>>>>   you're   
   >>>>>>>>>         thrown in prison. Hell, some native Brits have been arrested   
   >>>>>>>>> merely for   
   >>>>>>>>>       saying   
   >>>>>>>>>         they like bacon. But the Muslims? If you report them for far   
   more   
   >>>>>>>>>   serious   
   >>>>>>>>>         things like threatening your life, let alone offending you,   
   the police   
   >>>>>>>>>     drop   
   >>>>>>>>>       it   
   >>>>>>>>>         the moment they realize the suspect is brown, migrant, or   
   Muslim.   
   >>>>>>>>>   They'll   
   >>>>>>>>>         literally tell you, "Sorry, those people are protected."   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>       So as not to compare apples to oranges, it'd be helpful to see   
   (which I   
   >>>>>>>>       haven't) a wriggle-free instance equivalent to "Fuck Judaism"   
   being   
   >>>>>>>>       punished while "Fuck Islam" isn't.  Both seem unequivocally   
   hate speech.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>       Except the case in question wasn't "Fuck Islam", it was "Fuck   
   Hamas". A   
   >>>>>>>     group   
   >>>>>>>       which the UK government itself designates a terrorist   
   organization. So   
   >>>>>>>   here   
   >>>>>>>     we   
   >>>>>>>       have the UK locking up one of its own citizens for insulting a   
   bunch of   
   >>>>>>>       terrorists. It's literally illegal to hurt the feelings of   
   terrorists   
   >>>>>>>   in the   
   >>>>>>>       UK.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>     You write:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>          "There are imams directly calling for the overthrow of the UK   
   >>>>>>     government and the killing of Jews and Christians and they're left   
   >>>>>>     alone. Not even a visit from the police, let alone a prosecution or   
   >>>>>>     deportation."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>     That does sound clearly illegal.  Do you have a reputable cite?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>     Read up on the case of Alaa Abd el-Fattah.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     From Wiki:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        Abd El-Fattah wrote "Looking at the tweets now – the ones that   
   were   
   >>>>   not completely twisted out of their meaning – I do understand how   
   >>>>   shocking and hurtful they are, and for that I unequivocally apologise".   
   >>>   
   >>>   Did Lucy Connelly get the chance to apologize for her tweets and just   
   move   
   >>> on   
   >>>   with her life? Nope. She got dumped in the clink for two years.   
   >>>   
   >>>   But ol' Abd, he gets to just say, "Whoops! Sorry!" and the UK government   
   >>> looks   
   >>>   the other way.   
   >>>   
   >>>   And if you believe that apology is sincere and he no longer feels that   
   way,   
   >>> I   
   >>>   have some bridges you might be interested in purchasing.   
   >>   
   >> I allow that someone seems to have "made an example" of her.  Likewise,   
   >> the Muslim guy (whose apology was perhaps more a "bending of the knee")   
   >> seems to have benefited as different "example".   
   >   
   > Looks like a lot of white native Brits are being made an example, while a lot   
   > of non-native sub-Saharans and Muslims are getting that "different example"   
   > treatment.   
   >   
   >   
   > https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/2010276038387834880/pu/vi   
   /avc1/576x988/GJPbsUOvv25eK2nI.mp4   
   >   
   > Here we have a white native Brit arrested at 4AM, in front of his   
   > cancer-stricken wife, for saying on social media that he dislikes seeing   
   > Palestinian flags everywhere.   
   >   
   > No threat. No violence. Just an opinion.   
   >   
   > This isn’t the democracy the government keeps claiming it is. It's   
   > totalitarianism.   
   >   
   > Meanwhile, Muslims in the streets are openly chanting support for Hamas, a   
   > terrorist organization, which is indirect support for the idea of mass   
   > slaughter of Jews, which is what Hamas stands for, and literally none of them   
   > are visited by the police in the middle of the night.   
   >   
   > How many "examples" does it take before it becomes routine policy?   
      
   On it's own, I can't make clear sense of the video.  If his Facebook   
   post was all that he was arrested for, I'd like to see it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)