From: thetruemelissa@gmail.com   
      
   Verily, in article <10k9vqo$id7d$1@dont-email.me>, did ahk@chinet.com   
   deliver unto us this message:   
   >   
   > Yeah, ok, that's the wrong question. This is the case about whether the   
   > Idaho state law complies with Title IX, right? For the purpose of Title IX,   
   > if we rule that the law protects men competing with women, how have women   
   > not been discriminated against and denied the equal protection of the law?   
   >   
   > 	No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be   
   > 	excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be   
   > 	subjected to discrimination under any education program or   
   > 	activity receiving Federal financial assistance.   
   >   
   > "on the basis of sex" may not protect a dude who claims to be a woman.   
      
      
   Obama sent around an order that "sex," in Title IX, should be   
   interpreted to mean gender identity. Since he was the Chief Executive,   
   he got to do that. Many pointed out that XX persons no longer had any   
   protection, but few cared.   
      
      
   --   
   The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio   
   United States of America - North America - Earth   
   Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group   
   Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)