From: atropos@mac.com   
      
   On Jan 14, 2026 at 10:00:56 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""    
   wrote:   
      
   > BTR1701  wrote:   
   >   
   >> During oral argument at the Supreme Court this week, in a case where the   
   >> Court will decide the fate of state laws barring males from competing in   
   >> women's sports, Justice Alito asked a perfectly reasonable and logical   
   >> question of the attorney representing the transformers:   
   >   
   >> ALITO: For purposes of Equal Protection, for the 14th Amendment analysis,   
   >> what does it mean to be a boy or a girl?"   
   >   
   > Yeah, ok, that's the wrong question. This is the case about whether the   
   > Idaho state law complies with Title IX, right?   
      
   It was a conglomeration of several cases with several plaintiff-transformers.   
   Idaho was only one of them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)