From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 1/14/2026 10:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > During oral argument at the Supreme Court this week, in a case where the   
   Court   
   > will decide the fate of state laws barring males from competing in women's   
   > sports, Justice Alito asked a perfectly reasonable and logical question of   
   the   
   > attorney representing the transformers:   
   >   
   > ALITO: For purposes of Equal Protection, for the 14th Amendment analysis,   
   what   
   > does it mean to be a boy or a girl?"   
   >   
   > After a lot of stammering and hedging, the attorney replied, "We do not have   
   a   
   > definition for the Court."   
   >   
   > So basically, Alito asked "What is a woman?" and (much like Ketanji Jackson   
   in   
   > her confirmation hearing) a Harvard Law School-educated attorney standing   
   > before the Supreme Court of the United States simply can't tell you what a   
   > woman is. The official position of the transformer community apparently is,   
   > "No one really knows what a woman is. It's a mystery for the ages."   
   >   
   > Thankfully, it seems the Supreme Court is preparing to end this nonsense and   
   > uphold the state laws trying to eradicate this lunacy.   
      
   That community is right: no one knows what a woman "is".  Of course,   
   quite a few armchair biologists *claim* to know...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)