Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.tv    |    The boob tube, its history, and past and    |    233,998 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 232,790 of 233,998    |
|    Socialism fails to All    |
|    String Up The Bitch? DHS' Noem faces new    |
|    16 Jan 26 18:18:57    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.politics.immigration       XPost: alt.politics.trump       From: MeanDog@BiteMe.dash              DHS’ Noem faces new articles of impeachment backed by dozens of House       Democrats              The effort to hold the Homeland Security secretary to account probably       won’t pass, but that doesn’t make it irrelevant.       Jan. 14, 2026, 2:32 PM EST       By       Steve Benen              After almost a year of scandals, crises and abuses, Homeland Security       Secretary Kristi Noem’s public standing has predictably deteriorated. The       latest Quinnipiac University poll, for example, found that 52% of Americans       disapprove of the South Dakota Republican’s job performance, while only 36%       approve. Both numbers are slightly worse than when Quinnipiac asked the       same question last summer.              The DHS secretary is finding plenty of detractors on Capitol Hill, too.              Last week, Democratic Rep. Robin Kelly of Illinois announced plans to file       articles of impeachment against Noem. This week, she followed through —       along with quite a few of her colleagues. HuffPost reported:               With the support of nearly 70 colleagues, Rep. Robin Kelly (D-Ill.) on       Wednesday introduced three articles of impeachment against Homeland       Security Secretary Kristi Noem.               The first accuses Noem of obstruction of Congress, for denying       lawmakers access to Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities to       provide oversight. The second accuses her of violating public trust, for       directing DHS agents to arrest people without warrants and for ignoring due       process. The third accuses her of self-dealing, for secretly steering a       federal contract to a firm run by her friend.              “Secretary Noem has called my impeachment effort ‘silly,’” Kelly told       reporters. “I want to tell her right now, ‘Secretary Noem, you have       violated your oath of office, and there will be consequences. I am watching       you. Members of Congress are watching you. The American people, most       importantly, are watching you.’”              Those who don’t follow Capitol Hill at a granular level may not realize       this, but every year, members introduce impeachment resolutions that target       assorted figures, most of which generate very little attention or support.       That includes last year: A still-pending effort to impeach Defense       Secretary Pete Hegseth, for example, was introduced in early December, and       it’s garnered zero co-sponsors. A related push to impeach Health and Human       Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has picked up just one co-sponsor.              The articles of impeachment against Noem, however, are quantitatively       different: Kelly’s resolution was introduced with the support of 69 House       Democrats, which represents roughly a third of the party’s conference in       the chamber, and there’s no reason to assume that total won’t grow.                     For most of American history, only one Cabinet secretary was ever       impeached: In 1876, the House impeached Secretary of War William Belknap —       after he left office — over alleged bribes. (He was later acquitted by       senators.)              Almost two years ago, Belknap got a little company: Republicans impeached       then-Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, despite having       uncovered no evidence that the DHS secretary had done anything to merit       impeachment.              Will Noem join the tiny club? Probably not anytime soon: The House       Republican majority in the lower chamber is tiny and shrinking, but it       exists, and GOP leaders will almost certainly ignore the Democratic effort       to hold her accountable.              But there’s certainly symbolic value in the Democratic effort, which is       being used to draw attention to the failures and outrages at the Department       of Homeland Security. Watch this space.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca