From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 1/28/2026 1:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Jan 28, 2026 at 2:29:11 AM PST, "Mad Dog"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Irish Star   
   >>   
   >> Melania Trump suffers huge blow as critics admit they thought her   
   >> documentary was a joke   
   >> Story by Kathleen O'Boyle   
   >>   
   >> As First Lady Melania Trump continues promotional work for her upcoming   
   >> documentary Melania, critics online have reacted sharply to the project's   
   >> trailer, with viewers saying they 'thought it was a joke. '   
   >>   
   >> The documentary, produced in part by Melania and directed by Brett Ratner,   
   >> is set for a worldwide theatrical release on January 30, 2026, and will be   
   >> followed by streaming availability on Amazon Prime Video.   
   >>   
   >> Melania attempts to provide audiences with a behind-the-scenes look at the   
   >> 20 days leading up to President Donald Trump's second inauguration, with   
   >> footage that includes Melania engaging in activities ranging from travel to   
   >> meetings and personal moments.   
   >>   
   >> As the trailer circulated on social media platforms, viewers slammed   
   >> Melania for her work on the documentary. On X, one commenter wrote, "I   
   >> thought this was a joke post. "   
   >>   
   >> Another user posted, "get the f— out of here maam. " "Nobody cares! "   
   >> someone else wrote, with another adding, "Ain't no one going the first time   
   >> to your home video let alone going again. "   
   >>   
   >> Someone else's comment simply said, "I'd rather watch paint dry, " with   
   >> another adding, "Please girl, nobody is interested. "   
   >   
   > It's hilarious how news articles these days quote random replies on social   
   > media as if they're in any way significant or meaningful.   
   >   
   > "One commenter wrote..."   
   > "Another user posted..."   
   > "Someone else said..."   
   >   
   > These people don't even have names, there's no indication of who they are,   
   > what expertise they have with regard to critiquing film, what they do for a   
   > living, etc. Just "someone said..." Why should I as the reader of the article   
   > give a tin shit what any of these people said or how they feel?   
      
   You shouldn't ...any more than you should, without compelling reason,   
   invest any time in the flick.  You *could*, however, read the juicier   
   comments for verbal entertainment.  (The subject header's not bad.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)