home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.tv      The boob tube, its history, and past and      233,998 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 232,944 of 233,998   
   super70s to Mitchell Holman   
   Re: The Melania Movie: "If They Showed T   
   28 Jan 26 18:04:50   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump   
   From: super70s@super70s.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    Mitchell Holman  wrote:   
      
   > BTR1701  wrote in news:10ldl1i$n46s$2@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   > > On Jan 28, 2026 at 2:29:11 AM PST, "Mad Dog"    
   > > wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> Irish Star   
   > >>   
   > >> Melania Trump suffers huge blow as critics admit they thought her   
   > >> documentary was a joke   
   > >> Story by Kathleen O'Boyle   
   > >>   
   > >> As First Lady Melania Trump continues promotional work for her   
   > >> upcoming documentary Melania, critics online have reacted sharply to   
   > >> the project's trailer, with viewers saying they 'thought it was a   
   > >> joke. '   
   > >>   
   > >> The documentary, produced in part by Melania and directed by Brett   
   > >> Ratner, is set for a worldwide theatrical release on January 30,   
   > >> 2026, and will be followed by streaming availability on Amazon Prime   
   > >> Video.   
   > >>   
   > >> Melania attempts to provide audiences with a behind-the-scenes look   
   > >> at the 20 days leading up to President Donald Trump's second   
   > >> inauguration, with footage that includes Melania engaging in   
   > >> activities ranging from travel to meetings and personal moments.   
   > >>   
   > >> As the trailer circulated on social media platforms, viewers slammed   
   > >> Melania for her work on the documentary. On X, one commenter wrote,   
   > >> "I thought this was a joke post. "   
   > >>   
   > >> Another user posted, "get the f╉ out of here maam. " "Nobody cares!   
   > >> " someone else wrote, with another adding, "Ain't no one going the   
   > >> first time to your home video let alone going again. "   
   > >>   
   > >> Someone else's comment simply said, "I'd rather watch paint dry, "   
   > >> with another adding, "Please girl, nobody is interested. "   
   > >   
   > > It's hilarious how news articles these days quote random replies on   
   > > social media as if they're in any way significant or meaningful.   
   > >   
   > > "One commenter wrote..."   
   > > "Another user posted..."   
   > > "Someone else said..."   
   > >   
   > > These people don't even have names, there's no indication of who they   
   > > are, what expertise they have with regard to critiquing film, what   
   > > they do for a living, etc. Just "someone said..." Why should I as the   
   > > reader of the article give a tin shit what any of these people said or   
   > > how they feel?   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   >     And now we have a whole government based   
   > on this. Haitians eating dogs? "Heard that   
   > from various sources". Greenlanders want the   
   > US to invade? "Their stories are all over   
   > the internet". Norwegians want a Nobel Prize   
   > for Trump? "I have seen the social media posts,   
   > they all want to honor me"   
      
   Trump will probably buy several thousand ghost tickets like a lot of   
   rightwing book authors so it will look like a big success.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca