From: NoBody@nowhere.com
On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:23:30 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701
wrote:
>On Jan 28, 2026 at 12:40:53 PM PST, "shawn"
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 20:05:19 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A leftist mob swarms a random car in Minneapolis just because they suspect
>>> the
>>> driver is conservative, and they become so violent that the driver has to
>>> speed away in fear.
>>>
>>> Literally no reason... just instant violence. This isn't a protest, it's a
>>> hunting party.
>>>
>>> And the legacy corporate media shamelessly does an absolute cover?up of it
>>> all.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2013609805424832512/vi
/avc1/1228x720/_aoRokY1NhWCuATW.mp4
>>
>> I don't know what led them to go after the guy but he clearly had done
>> something earlier that upset the group. They were saying "That's him!
>> That's him" which is what I expect when someone did something that
>> upset the group.
>
>Yes, it turns out he used his 1st Amendment right to say conservative things.
>That's all it takes to have a mob surround your car and try and drag you out
>by the feet in 2026 Minneapolis. And even though it's documented on video, you
>won't see a word about it on CNN or BSNBC or any of the broadcast networks.
>They'll hold requiems for a nutbag who died trying to run over a cop, but
>shrieking lunatics surrounding cars in street, trying to drag out the
>occupants and do who knows what to them? Not a peep.
>
>It's too bad none of them were run over when the car sped away.
>
>> Much more so than him just being conservative.
>
>Why would you say that?
>
>Two people are dead and a third has been injured over the last three weeks in
>Minneapolis alone because leftists cannot accept the idea that the other side
>gets a say in how this country is governed, even when they lose an election.
>
>They genuinely believe they can just do whatever they want, and if they engage
>in enough moral outrage and petulant acts of violence, they can force their
>desired outcome as a fait accompli.
>
>The "Trump is very dangerous for our democracy" crowd equates literal mob
>violence to democracy and have constructed a metaphysical fantasy in their
>heads where they get to always be in charge regardless of election outcomes
>because they're on the "right side of history" and their hearts are with the
>angels or something.
>
>The Left always denies legitimacy to any actual exercise of power on the
>right. Always. Sometimes this is on the path to civil war (Spain 1936; Finland
>1918). Sometimes they succeed for a long time (modern Europe). Sometimes it's
>right here on RAT where I actually once was able to get FPP to admit that he
>believes certain powers of the presidency are only legitimate when wielded by
>Democrats.
>
>We are only seeing this bald-faced display of leftist arrogance now because
>the supposed representative of the American Right, the Republican Party, for
>decades has meekly agreed to never exercise real power whenever they win the
>ability to wield it. For the first time, there's a right-leaning president in
>office who isn't afraid to exercise the powers the Constitution gives him. We
>see the Left increasingly turning to violence because a change in this status
>quo is intolerable to them.
>
>How can you share a country with these people? How can we possibly maintain
>societal order with one side that refuses to accept the legitimacy of the
>other even when it wins elections via the democracy they're constantly saying
>needs to be saved?
>
>We can't.
>
You've explained the problem in our country perfectly.
Thank you.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
