From: no_offline_contact@example.com   
      
   On 2026-01-30 1:40 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Jan 30, 2026 at 5:35:03 AM PST, "Rhino"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-01-29 11:54 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>>   First Spain grants citizenship to a half-million illegals and now the   
   Oxford   
   >>>   Council votes to impose digital walls on all its citizens. The globalist   
   >>>   elites are really just taking the masks off and putting their New World   
   >>> Order   
   >>>   agenda on display right out into the open now, aren't they?   
   >>>   
   >>>   Oxford already started the conversion project several years ago-- as it   
   >>>   becomes the first official World Economic Forum-planned "15-minute city',   
   >>>   where Oxford is divided up into six zones. You're given predetermined   
   routes   
   >>>   you must drive to get from place to place, your car tracked in real time,   
   >>>   everything monitored by a panopticon of cameras and e-gates. You must   
   have a   
   >>>   permit to leave your assigned zone and you're only allowed 100   
   permits/year.   
   >>>   After that, punishing fines start arriving if you leave your   
   >>>   government-imposed 15 minutes of freedom.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2015917825903263745/vi   
   /avc1/1280x704/v0SJi25gYb5punKO.mp4   
   >>>   
   >>>   So far, it seems like this digital prison only applies to your car. There   
   >>>   doesn't seem to be any prohibition on walking or biking between the zones   
   >>> and   
   >>>   I bet someone on a motorcycle could avoid the digital barriers also.   
   >>>   
   >>>   I told you back in 2017 that this was coming. Every major American and   
   >>>   Canadian city (and many of the minor ones) all already have "15-minute   
   city"   
   >>>   plans drawn up. It's only a matter of time before they impose their   
   digital   
   >>>   prison on you, too.   
   >>>   
   >>>   Yet another "conspiracy theory" confirmed as truth.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >> I saw a video a year or two back - I believe it was from Oxford - and   
   >> the guy making it was a motorcyclist. He drove his bike past some of the   
   >> barriers impeding cars from using certain routes and pointed out that   
   >> several of these barriers had been pushed aside overnight by mysterious   
   >> forces. Clearly, there would be opportunities for people to move these   
   >> obstacles around is they felt so inclined.   
   >>   
   >> The obvious antidote to that is to put up surveillance cameras but that   
   >> won't necessarily solve the problem. There was a particularly notorious   
   >> speed camera in Toronto that got ripped out at least a half dozen times   
   >> AFTER they put up a surveillance camera and no one ever caught the   
   >> guy/group who was doing it. (Then Doug Ford abolished speed cameras   
   >> province-wide.)   
   >>   
   >> The whole concept of 15 minute cities is preposterous unless every place   
   >> you'd want to go is within those 15 minutes but how many people work   
   >> that close to their homes, have all their kids schools that close, and   
   >> have most facilities they use frequently that close by?   
   >   
   > Or who don't have friends or relatives that live in other parts of town. Or   
   > want to go see a baseball game or go to a theme park or attend a party. Life   
   > for most normal people is literally full of things that are more than 15   
   > minutes from their home.   
      
   Exactly. I listed the obvious things like work and school but there are   
   obviously a great many more reasons to leave your zone.   
      
   > In L.A. this would go over like a turd in a swimming   
   > pool as literally millions of people would be caught living in one zone and   
   > working in another and being told you'll be fined hundreds of dollars/day   
   just   
   > for commuting to work... well, if you think those ICE riots were bad...   
   >   
   > And leaving the practical details aside, why does the government think it has   
   > the authority to do this in the first place? It simply doesn't. At least not   
   > here.   
   >   
   It should never have that authority ANYWHERE that people consider   
   themselves free.   
      
   >> I'd estimate damned few of them! If you then have a quota of "free" trips   
   >> that is too   
   >> low to accommodate the places that are farther away, you are punishing   
   >> people quite severely.   
   >   
   > My first response: Who the fuck are you to give me a quota of "freedom   
   > permits". Fuck all the way off before I shove those permits so far up your   
   > ass, you'll be able to taste the flavor of the ink on them.   
   >   
   >> You're basically putting them in lockdown except   
   >> that this time it wouldn't be "for two weeks to flatten the curve", it   
   >> would be FOREVER.   
   >   
   > And if you're one of the globalist elite, that's sounds just fine.   
   >   
   > I'd be curious to find out how many "freedom permits" the mayor and the city   
   > council of Oxford are allowed? Is it the same as the mere peons or do they   
   not   
   > even bother with permits at all. If you're one of the special few, do you   
   > still get to go wherever you want whenever you want?   
   >   
      
   I'd be truly shocked if they had to live by the same rules; they ALWAYS   
   seem to exempt themselves from the restrictions they impose on others,   
   either formally or unofficially. (In the latter case, they are   
   theoretically required to follow the same rules but whoever enforces the   
   rule simply never notices the leaders breaking the rules because they   
   value their job or freedom.)   
      
      
   --   
   Rhino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)