From: NoBody@nowhere.com
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 07:33:46 -0500, NoBody wrote:
>On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 04:14:11 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
> wrote:
>
>>BTR1701 wrote:
>>>On Jan 28, 2026 at 2:26:46 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>BTR1701 wrote:
>>
>>>>>Two people are dead and a third has been injured over the last three
>>>>>weeks in Minneapolis alone because leftists cannot accept the idea
>>>>>that the other side gets a say in how this country is governed, even
>>>>>when they lose an election.
>>
>>>>I'm calling bullshit. The immigration enforcement has been anything but
>>>>useful. Federal agents don't get to tear gas protestors
>>
>>>But they do get to tear gas violent insurrectionists. If all these people
>>>did was stand on the sidewalk holding signs, beating their bongos, and
>>>chanting, no one would be tear gassed. But they're not doing that. They're
>>>assaulting the agents, throwing bricks and other dangerous objects at
>>>them, squirting them with water guns filled with urine, blocking their
>>>vehicles, trying to pull illegal alien arrestees out of their custody,
>>>and trying to run them down with cars.
>>
>>>None. Of. That. Is. Protesting.
>>
>>I'm not disagreeing with your examples. On the other hand, ICE has no
>>business creating these ridiculous situations for a show of force. What
>>does any of that have to do with capturing illegal aliens?
>
>The show of force has become necessary because of the violence
>directed at them.
>
>>
>>ICE has no business doing crowd control. They aren't trained in these
>>techniques. No real cop would behave like this, go to tear gas and stun
>>grenades first. But then, no real cops are used to create scenarios for
>>attracting protestors.
>>
>
>If only local officials would do the crowd control...
>
>
>>Local cops, trying to keep the protestors at bay, have enjoyed the same
>>attention from tear gas.
>
>Citation required for context.
>
>>
>>ICE is violating constitutional right after constitutional right. They
>>interdict anyone based on appearance and accent, and this includes
>>American citizens. Americans are not required to carry citizenship
>>papers with them; driver's license isn't a citizenship document, This
>>isn't fucking USSR or China.
>
>You're making some serious claims here. Show us your evidence from
>their orders that says this. Note: claims from the left and the
>media don't count.
>
>>
>>I'll point out the obvious, that when Tom Homan shut down the southern
>>border to illegal crossings, there were no widespread big city protests.
>>The protests are in response to absurd, heavy handed show of force
>>tactics being used in cities. Americans don't want their rights violated
>>and they don't want federal agents uselessly parading around cities.
>
>What rights are being violated?
>
>>
>>>None. Of. It. Is. Protected. By. The. 1st Amendment.
>>
>>>And using tear gas on crowds of committing criminal acts like that is
>>>precisely what tear gas is for.
>>
>>Tear gas has been used on individuals and very small groups, not just
>>crowds, and people in the crowds are generally not committing crimes.
>>
>
>Another sweeping claim.
>
>
>>>I posted this earlier in the week but it bears repeating:
>>
>>I read it. I haven't posted a followup yet.
>>
>>>>The three victims were shot because federal agents got trigger happy.
>>
>>>No. One person was shot because she was clearly trying to run down a cop.
>>
>>I don't agree, and the idea that a dead driver will bring the vehicle to
>>a complete stop means that the cop who shot Good dead was a moron. He
>>was able to step out of the vehicle's path which indicates he was never
>>in danger. And since when would a properly trained cop attempt to
>>intercept a vehicle with his own body?
>
>Another armchair quarterbacker. You do his job and stand there and
>let's see what your reaction is.
Of course there is no response.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
