From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 1/31/2026 5:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Jan 31, 2026 at 2:42:34 PM PST, "moviePig"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 1/29/2026 11:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   First Spain grants citizenship to a half-million illegals and now the   
   Oxford   
   >>>   Council votes to impose digital walls on all its citizens. The globalist   
   >>>   elites are really just taking the masks off and putting their New World   
   >>> Order   
   >>>   agenda on display right out into the open now, aren't they?   
   >>>   
   >>>   Oxford already started the conversion project several years ago-- as it   
   >>>   becomes the first official World Economic Forum-planned "15-minute city',   
   >>>   where Oxford is divided up into six zones. You're given predetermined   
   routes   
   >>>   you must drive to get from place to place, your car tracked in real time,   
   >>>   everything monitored by a panopticon of cameras and e-gates. You must   
   have a   
   >>>   permit to leave your assigned zone and you're only allowed 100   
   permits/year.   
   >>>   After that, punishing fines start arriving if you leave your   
   >>>   government-imposed 15 minutes of freedom.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2015917825903263745/vi   
   /avc1/1280x704/v0SJi25gYb5punKO.mp4   
   >>>   
   >>>   So far, it seems like this digital prison only applies to your car. There   
   >>>   doesn't seem to be any prohibition on walking or biking between the zones   
   >>> and   
   >>>   I bet someone on a motorcycle could avoid the digital barriers also.   
   >>>   
   >>>   I told you back in 2017 that this was coming. Every major American and   
   >>>   Canadian city (and many of the minor ones) all already have "15-minute   
   city"   
   >>>   plans drawn up. It's only a matter of time before they impose their   
   digital   
   >>>   prison on you, too.   
   >>>   
   >>>   Yet another "conspiracy theory" confirmed as truth.   
   >>   
   >> How should (very non-theoretical) congestion be dealt with?   
   >   
   > First of all, this isn't a congestion relief measure. The stated purpose for   
   > all this is yet another sacrificial prayer to the Climate Cult.   
   >   
   > Second, if the only way to deal with congestion is to impose an Orwellian   
   > forever-lockdown and surveillance panopticon on the populace, then you just   
   > live with congestion because there's no rational argument against it being   
   the   
   > lesser of the two evils.   
      
   You're calling it an automatic "lesser of two evils" because you're   
   leery of anything that could eventually become nefarious surveillance.   
   While concern may be warranted, I'm not sure summary rejection is.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)