From: atropos@mac.com   
      
   On Feb 3, 2026 at 7:43:32 PM PST, "super70s"    
   wrote:   
      
   > On 2026-02-03 21:51:20 +0000, BTR1701 said:   
   >   
   >>  On Feb 3, 2026 at 1:03:04 PM PST, "super70s"    
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>  On 2026-02-02 20:43:26 +0000, BTR1701 said:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>  And these dipshits filmed themselves committing the crimes, so   
   prosecutors   
   >>>>  don't even have to do much work here. (Unless they draw a judge who   
   >>>>  graduated   
   >>>>  from Law & Order Judicial Academy, in which case, all video evidence   
   will be   
   >>>>  suppressed because Lemon didn't Mirandize himself and warn himself of his   
   >>>>  right to remain silent before turning the camera on or some such burning   
   >>>>  nonsense.)   
   >>>   
   >>>  He's going to win his case   
   >>   
   >>  He shouldn't. His actions more than met the elements of the offense, beyond   
   >>  any reasonable doubt. If he's acquitted it's because the jury is playing   
   >>  political games, like they did with OJ.   
   >   
   > When he's acquitted it will be because of his 1st Amendment rights   
   > under the US Constitution, with a little bit of vindictive prosecution   
   > thrown in.   
      
   Which part of the 1st Amendment allows you to trespass on private property   
   (after being explicitly told to leave by the property owner) and disrupt   
   others' 1st Amendment rights to practice their religion?   
      
   Please be specific and back it up with case citations, because this is a new   
   one for me. My focus in law school was 1st Amendment law and copyright law and   
   I don't recall any case, statute, or the Constitution itself that allows   
   private property rights to be overridden merely because some jackass holds up   
   the word "journalist" like a shield.   
      
   > Trump was grunting about him shortly before this incident   
   > even happened (then after it did he claimed he "didn't know who Don   
   > Lemon was," lol).   
      
   So? What does that have to do with anything?   
      
   >>>  so get some excuse ready like the judge was Black or Hispanic.   
   >>   
   >>  Why do you capitalize black but not white? Seems pretty bigoted to me.   
   >   
   > Are you saying Trump is a bigot? Because he uses that excuse all the   
   > time when judges don't rule in his favor, even Black or Hispanic judges   
   > appointed by Republican presidents.   
      
   Trump has never used capitalizing the word 'black' but not 'white' as an   
   excuse for anything.   
      
   You, on the other hand, have not answered the question. Why do you capitalize   
   the word black but not white? Do you think blacks are more special than whites   
   or something? 'Cause if so, that's what we call racism.   
      
   >>>  The regime knows this of course, for them it's the process and not a   
   >>>  conviction which is the punishment.   
   >>   
   >>  Well, at least we'll have that.   
   >   
   > I'm old enough to remember when your side squealed "lawfare."   
   >   
   >>>  Meanwhile subscriptions to his YouTube channel are going to skyrocket   
   >>>  thanks to all the free publicity by Trump.   
   >>   
   >>  And then drop off again when people realize how profoundly stupid Lemon is.   
   >>   
   >>  I just watched a clip of him not only arguing with someone on the street   
   >> that   
   >>  a misdemeanor is not a crime but with a condescending attitude that   
   >> suggested   
   >>  the other guy was the stupid one for thinking it is a crime.   
   >>   
   >>  For the record, misdemeanors are indeed crimes and Lemon is only a few IQ   
   >>  points above retarded.   
   >   
   > Depends on the jurisdiction Perry Mason, in some states misdos are   
   > non-criminal/civil infractions.   
      
   Ah, you've got that same smug Lemon-like condescension while saying stupid and   
   provably wrong shit. Well done!   
      
   (1) That's a legal impossibility. The literal definition of 'misdemeanor' is   
   any crime for which the punishment is less than a year behind bars. A crime   
   for which the punishment is more than a year is a felony. You can't be put in   
   jail or prison for a non-criminal civil infraction, so by definition those   
   can't be a misdemeanors.   
      
   (2) Just to be on the safe side in case something wild had changed in the law,   
   I went to the AI and asked it:   
      
   "Is there any state in the United States where misdemeanors are not crimes?"   
      
   ANSWER: "No, there is no state in the United States where misdemeanors are not   
   considered crimes. In every U.S. state (and under federal law), a misdemeanor   
   is defined as a type of criminal offense."   
      
   So you wanna try that again, slappy?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)