From: atropos@mac.com   
      
   On Feb 4, 2026 at 5:11:22 AM PST, "super70s"    
   wrote:   
      
   > On 2026-02-04 04:30:48 +0000, BTR1701 said:   
   >   
   >>  On Feb 3, 2026 at 7:43:32 PM PST, "super70s"    
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>  On 2026-02-03 21:51:20 +0000, BTR1701 said:   
   >>>   
   >>>>  On Feb 3, 2026 at 1:03:04 PM PST, "super70s"    
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>  On 2026-02-02 20:43:26 +0000, BTR1701 said:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>  And these dipshits filmed themselves committing the crimes, so   
   prosecutors   
   >>>>>>  don't even have to do much work here. (Unless they draw a judge who   
   >>>>>>  graduated   
   >>>>>>  from Law & Order Judicial Academy, in which case, all video evidence   
   will be   
   >>>>>>  suppressed because Lemon didn't Mirandize himself and warn himself of   
   his   
   >>>>>>  right to remain silent before turning the camera on or some such   
   burning   
   >>>>>>  nonsense.)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>  He's going to win his case   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  He shouldn't. His actions more than met the elements of the offense,   
   beyond   
   >>>>  any reasonable doubt. If he's acquitted it's because the jury is playing   
   >>>>  political games, like they did with OJ.   
   >>>   
   >>>  When he's acquitted it will be because of his 1st Amendment rights   
   >>>  under the US Constitution, with a little bit of vindictive prosecution   
   >>>  thrown in.   
   >>   
   >>  Which part of the 1st Amendment allows you to trespass on private property   
   >>  (after being explicitly told to leave by the property owner) and disrupt   
   >>  others' 1st Amendment rights to practice their religion?   
   >>   
   >>  Please be specific and back it up with case citations, because this is a   
   new   
   >>  one for me. My focus in law school was 1st Amendment law and copyright law   
   >> and   
   >>  I don't recall any case, statute, or the Constitution itself that allows   
   >>  private property rights to be overridden merely because some jackass holds   
   >> up   
   >>  the word "journalist" like a shield.   
   >   
   > We all know you only have a bug up your ass about this because you   
   > don't agree with Lemon's political views. And/or because he's openly   
   > gay. If Jesse Watters or some other rightwing grenade thrower had done   
   > this we wouldn't hear a peep from you (or Trump's corrupt DOJ).   
      
   So I'll assume from your non-answer and attempt at deflection that you can't   
   cite and case or statute that allows someone to trespass on private property   
   and override the owner's rights merely by shouting "I'm a journalist!"   
      
   > Also it's amusing that a church is the utmost in sacredness to you   
   > guys, but not the US Capitol building   
      
   That's because one is literally sacred because it's a house of worship and the   
   other is just a government building that has nothing to do with religion and   
   there can't be sacred by definition.   
      
   We don't worship the government like leftists do.   
      
   >>>  Trump was grunting about him shortly before this incident   
   >>>  even happened (then after it did he claimed he "didn't know who Don   
   >>>  Lemon was," lol).   
   >>   
   >>  So? What does that have to do with anything?   
   >   
   > See "vindictive prosecution" above, which you skated over. Maybe you   
   > missed class that day, Clarence Darrow.   
      
   But Biden's DOJ prosecuting little old ladies under the exact same law for   
   silently praying on a sidewalk (public property) and throwing them in prison   
   for 40 months wasn't vindictive or anything.   
      
   You're a cartoon.   
      
   >>>>>  so get some excuse ready like the judge was Black or Hispanic.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  Why do you capitalize black but not white? Seems pretty bigoted to me.   
   >>>   
   >>>  Are you saying Trump is a bigot? Because he uses that excuse all the   
   >>>  time when judges don't rule in his favor, even Black or Hispanic judges   
   >>>  appointed by Republican presidents.   
   >>   
   >>  Trump has never used capitalizing the word 'black' but not 'white' as an   
   >>  excuse for anything.   
   >>   
   >>  You, on the other hand, have not answered the question. Why do you   
   >> capitalize   
   >>  the word black but not white? Do you think blacks are more special than   
   >> whites   
   >>  or something? 'Cause if so, that's what we call racism.   
   >   
   > ? I didn't even refer to any other race than Black or Hispanic   
      
   You have in the past and you didn't capitalize 'white' when you did it. So   
   answer question. Why do you capitalize black but not white? Why are you a   
   racist bigot?   
      
   >>>>>  The regime knows this of course, for them it's the process and not a   
   >>>>>  conviction which is the punishment.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  Well, at least we'll have that.   
   >>>   
   >>>  I'm old enough to remember when your side squealed "lawfare."   
   >>>   
   >>>>>  Meanwhile subscriptions to his YouTube channel are going to skyrocket   
   >>>>>  thanks to all the free publicity by Trump.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  And then drop off again when people realize how profoundly stupid Lemon   
   is.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  I just watched a clip of him not only arguing with someone on the street   
   >>>>  that   
   >>>>  a misdemeanor is not a crime but with a condescending attitude that   
   >>>>  suggested   
   >>>>  the other guy was the stupid one for thinking it is a crime.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  For the record, misdemeanors are indeed crimes and Lemon is only a few IQ   
   >>>>  points above retarded.   
   >>>   
   >>>  Depends on the jurisdiction Perry Mason, in some states misdos are   
   >>>  non-criminal/civil infractions.   
   >>   
   >>  Ah, you've got that same smug Lemon-like condescension while saying stupid   
   >> and   
   >>  provably wrong shit. Well done!   
   >>   
   >>  (1) That's a legal impossibility. The literal definition of 'misdemeanor'   
   is   
   >>  any crime for which the punishment is less than a year behind bars. A crime   
   >>  for which the punishment is more than a year is a felony. You can't be put   
   >> in   
   >>  jail or prison for a non-criminal civil infraction, so by definition those   
   >>  can't be a misdemeanors.   
   >>   
   >>  (2) Just to be on the safe side in case something wild had changed in the   
   >> law,   
   >>  I went to the AI and asked it:   
   >>   
   >>  "Is there any state in the United States where misdemeanors are not   
   crimes?"   
   >>   
   >>  ANSWER: "No, there is no state in the United States where misdemeanors are   
   >> not   
   >>  considered crimes. In every U.S. state (and under federal law), a   
   >> misdemeanor   
   >>  is defined as a type of criminal offense."   
   >>   
   >>  So you wanna try that again, slappy?   
   >   
   > You wanna get your information from some other place than ChatGPT,   
   > numbnuts?   
      
   (1) I didn't use ChatGPT, so there's another strike against you.   
      
   (2) If you're so sure you're right, cite me the state where a misdemeanor   
   isn't a criminal offense.   
      
   > In some states petty misdemeanors are not crimes, but a regular   
   > misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor is.   
      
   Cite them. Don't just say "some states". Tell us which ones.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)