From: dtravel@sonic.net   
      
   On 2/6/2026 4:40 AM, shawn wrote:   
   > On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 05:36:40 -0700, anim8rfsk    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> The True Melissa  wrote:   
   >>> Verily, in article <10m39q2$3lhvm$1@dont-email.me>, did   
   >>> YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:   
   >>>> "When a charismatic, youthfully defiant Sherlock Holmes meets   
   >>>> none other than James Moriarty,   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm already uninterested.   
   >>>   
   >>> There are villains other than Moriarty, FFS. A prequel Sherlock should   
   >>> get his own gallery of rogues.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, Moriarity just seems lazy.   
   >   
   > You expect writer to work for a living?!?!   
   > Also you forget viewers are lazy too. Mention some unknown villain and   
   > most  viewers would not tune in.   
      
   That's why you don't mention the Big Bad's name!  The viewers can just   
   assume its Moriarty until the production finally decides to "reveal" it   
   is actually Joe Blowvisky.   
      
   --   
   I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky   
   dirty old man.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)