Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.tv    |    The boob tube, its history, and past and    |    233,998 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 233,384 of 233,998    |
|    JTEM to All    |
|    Right Wing Failure: Feeble Old Insane Fe    |
|    11 Feb 26 02:34:58    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: jtem01@gmail.com              Trump’s failed presidency              Trump’s presidency is failing rapidly. Like others before him, modern       American presidents fail when they cannot master or comprehend the       government that they inherit. This is a hard concept to grasp in an age       when non-stop media coverage leads us to focus on the president’s       communication skills and when presidents themselves value spin more than       expertise. But in the end presidential failure is about reality, not       words—no matter how lofty and inspiring or how crude and insulting.              Contemporary presidents are especially prone to mistaking spin for reality       for several reasons. First of all, they are nominated not by other elected       officials who have some sense of what it takes to govern, but by activists       and party electorates who value inspiration and entertainment. Second, the       importance of mass communication leads presidents to believe that the words       and activities that got them into office can work once they are in office:       more rallies, more speeches, more tweets, and more television advertising.              Nothing can be further from the truth.              Presidential scholars have been aware of the disjuncture between       campaigning and governing for some time now. More than a decade ago, Sam       Kernell wrote a book called Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential       Leadership (CQ Press, 2007), in which he showed that beginning with       President Kennedy, modern presidents spent a great deal more time on minor       presidential addresses and on domestic and international travel than their       predecessors. All this communication, he argued, came at the expense of       actual governing. Later on another presidential scholar, George C. Edwards       III, writing in Overreach, Leadership in the Obama Presidency (Princeton       University Press, 2012) argued that Obama thought he could go directly to       the public to get support for his programs, an approach that placed       communication over negotiation and that resulted in a stunning midterm loss       for his party.              Reality still matters, and spin has its limits—even in an era of social       media.              As long as things are going okay for most people, Americans tolerate a       president’s verbal gymnastics. But when people are in trouble, even the       most ardent government haters ask that famous question: “Where’s the       government?” And for most Americans, the president is the government.       Following the botched federal response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the       collateral damage to the presidency of George W. Bush was extensive. His       popularity never recovered and his second-term agenda, including bold       changes to Social Security, was destroyed. Nearly a decade later when       President Obama rolled out his signature achievement, the Affordable Care       Act, the hugely embarrassing crashing of the computer systems meant to       implement the act increased Republican opposition to it and undermined       public confidence in the government’s ability to implement important       executive actions.              Trump’s failures during the coronavirus pandemic run the gamut from the       rhetorical to the organizational. Every time the president speaks he seems       to add to the fear and chaos surrounding the situation: telling Americans       it was not serious by asserting his “hunches” about data, assuring people       that everyone would be tested even when there were very few tests       available, telling people that we are very close to a vaccine when it is       anywhere from 12 to 18 months away, mistakenly asserting that goods as well       as people from Europe would be forbidden from entering the United States,       and announcing that Google had a website for testing while the initiative       was merely an unimplemented idea, were just a few of his televised gaffes.       After every presidential statement, “clarifications” were needed. Trump has       the unique distinction of giving a national address meant to calm the       country that had the effect of taking the stock market down over 1,000       points.              We have come to expect verbal imprecision and outright lies from this       president, but that is more easily corrected on less momentous       developments. When there is fundamental incompetence on matters of       tremendous importance, voters punish poor results. And this is where       Trump’s actions on the coronavirus have gone far off target. One of the       most glaring deficiencies of his administration has been the failure to       have enough tests available to identify those infected and to screen others       for possible exposure. South Korea, a country a fraction of the size of the       United States, is testing thousands more people a day than the United       States. The failure to produce tests quickly will go down as one of the       biggest failures in the overall handling of this disease because it       prevented authorities from understanding the scope of the pandemic and       therefore made it difficult for them to undertake appropriate steps to       mitigate its spread. Other countries had tests and now state governments       are rapidly rolling out their own tests after the CDC belatedly removed       regulatory barriers. Even the nation’s chief infectious disease doctor,       Anthony Fauci, has admitted that testing is a major failure—a statement       that is most certainly not one of the president’s talking points.              In this and other areas, Trump has failed to learn from the failures of his       predecessors. When President Ronald Reagan signed into law the fundamental       restructuring of the military known as the Goldwater-Nichols reforms,[1] he       did this knowing that he did not want a military fiasco on his watch like       the failed Iranian rescue mission that did in Jimmy Carter’s presidency.       And following the total breakdown in the Federal Emergency Management       Agency’s handling of Hurricane Katrina, President Barack Obama made sure       his FEMA director was an experienced state emergency management director.       He knew that poor performance during natural disasters would doom his       presidency.              During the Obama Administration, the White House dealt with a precursor of       the coronavirus: the Ebola virus. While the scrambling eventually worked       out thanks to decisive executive office leadership, it illustrated that       pandemics were a fundamental national security threat. They created the       Global Health Security Team in the National Security Council to prepare. In       May of 2018, Trump disbanded the team allegedly because he never thought       pandemics would happen and because “I’m a business person. I don’t like       having thousands of people around when you don’t need them.” Trump’s       hurried justification for abandoning a unit (that was well short of       thousands) showed Trump’s limited understanding of why government is       different from business—it is in the business of preparing for low-       probability events. For instance, the United States military spends              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca