From: atropos@mac.com   
      
   On Feb 11, 2026 at 9:16:11 AM PST, "moviePig"  wrote:   
      
   > On 2/11/2026 12:45 AM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>  On Feb 10, 2026 at 9:20:52 PM PST, "Dimensional Traveler"   
   >>    
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>  On 2/10/2026 6:26 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>    Dimensional Traveler   wrote:   
   >>>>>    On 2/10/2026 12:50 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>>>>    BTR1701   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>    On Sep 20, 2025 at 7:49:59 PM PDT, "Rhino"   
   >>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>    wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    California Gov. Nuisance has signed a bill banning law enforcement,   
   >>>>>>>>    including ICE agents from wearing masks as they perform their   
   duties.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://globalnews.ca/news/11438455/california-face-mask-b   
   n-law-enforcement/   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    As BTR1701 predicted recently, this is going to make it a lot   
   easier for   
   >>>>>>>>    "activists" to identify, harass, and even kill ICE agents and their   
   >>>>>>>>    families. Apparently, some of that has already happened. Newsom is   
   >>>>>>>>    almost literally painted targets on the backs of those who are only   
   >>>>>>>>    enforcing the laws.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    I think it is particularly telling that the law *doesn't* stop   
   criminals   
   >>>>>>>>    and "activists" (yes, I'm repeating myself there) from wearing   
   masks   
   >>>>>>>>    while they carry out THEIR activities. Apparently, it is "unsafe"   
   for   
   >>>>>>>>    ICE agents to keep their anonymity but perfectly fine for   
   criminals to   
   >>>>>>>>    do so.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    And this guy is the frontrunner for the presidential nomination   
   for the   
   >>>>>>>>    Democrats in 2028! Nonsense like this should be a compelling   
   argument to   
   >>>>>>>>    disqualify Newsom entirely!!!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>    As expected (and contrary to the claims of that brilliant legal mind   
   >>>>>>>    "super70s" here on RAT), a federal court has blocked Newsom's mask   
   >>>>>    ban for law   
   >>>>>>>    enforcement.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>    The reason being because as written it would have only applied to   
   >>>>>    city/county law enforcement and Federal law enforcement but not state   
   >>>>>    law enforcement.  So it was discriminatory.  The judge also made if   
   >>>>>    crystal clear that was the ONLY real reason for blocking that part.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    The other part, that the judge upheld, was the requirement to have   
   >>>>>    visible identification including names and/or badge numbers.  Which,   
   >>>>>    again as written, DID apply to all levels of law enforcement.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    My error. I said he upheld bodycams.   
   >>>   
   >>>  Ice Barbie claims...   
   >>   
   >>  I actually think the moniker "ICE Barbie" is pretty funny, but I will point   
   >>  out that when people were calling Alexandria Occasional-Cortex "Communist   
   >>  Barbie", we were all sternly admonished how misogynist that was.   
   >   
   > "Sternly admonished" by whom?  Her?...   
      
   Everyone from the leftist corporate legacy media and their leftist pundits to   
   Effa Pee Pee right here on RAT.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)