home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.tv      The boob tube, its history, and past and      233,998 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 233,501 of 233,998   
   BTR1701 to All   
   Re: [NEWS] "The Rockford Files" reboot s   
   13 Feb 26 06:02:00   
   
   From: atropos@mac.com   
      
   On Feb 12, 2026 at 9:14:34 PM PST, "Rhino"    
   wrote:   
      
   > On 2026-02-12 10:37 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:   
   >>  On Feb 12, 2026 at 5:35:18 PM PST, "shawn"    
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>  On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:38:37 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"   
   >>>   wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>  Your Name  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>       Iconic '70s NBC TV Show Reboot Finds Its Lead   
   >>>>>       ---------------------------------------------   
   >>>>>       NBC has officially found a star for a remake of one of the most   
   >>>>>       iconic television shows of the 1970s.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>       What NBC TV show has found its lead?   
   >>>>>       According to a new report from Deadline, David Boreanaz has closed   
   >>>>>       a deal to star in the upcoming reboot of The Rockford Files. The   
   >>>>>       Bones star will take on the role as James Rockford, a broke   
   >>>>>       private investigator who takes on a variety of cases. Deadline   
   >>>>>       reports that the role of Rockford was a sought after one, and now   
   >>>>>       with it cast, filming can begin.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  Jawdrop   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  He's pretty much the actor least likely to remind one of James Garner I   
   >>>>  can think of.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  When Josh Holloway was discussed a number of years ago, I didn't think   
   >>>>  he was a bad choice but I felt sorry for him as being compared to Garner   
   >>>>  would have hurt his career. Really just should have created an original   
   >>>>  character for him to play.   
   >>>   
   >>>  Agreed. I could see Holloway in the role. though I worry that the   
   >>>  writing will let whomever takes on the role down as the writing will   
   >>>  be a key to the success/failure of the project. The only thing I can   
   >>>  see in favor of Boreanaz as Rockford is the physical aspect. I don't   
   >>>  think he's going to work in any other aspect.   
   >>   
   >>  At least the role wasn't race and gender-swapped. That's about as much as   
   we   
   >>  can hope for from modern Hollywood.   
   >>   
   >>>>  No one would dream of comparing Boreanaz to Garner.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>       The report goes on to mention that the pilot for the show will   
   >>>>>       film in Atlanta.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  Brilliant! It's not like Los Angeles locations weren't integral to the   
   >>>>  show. What's next, he'll drive a Yugo? No sublime car chases?   
   >>>   
   >>>  I am torn as I love having more projects being filmed in the area, but   
   >>>  there's no way that Atlanta works as a replacement for Los Angeles,   
   >>>  especially the numerous beach shots they made the original show.   
   >>   
   >>  Yes, much like THE LINCOLN LAWYER and BOSCH, L.A. is a character in and of   
   >>  itself and if you don't shoot on location, you might as well just not do it   
   >> at   
   >>  all.   
   >>   
   >>  I was heartened to hear the upcoming BAYWATCH reboot has booked permits to   
   >>  shoot on L.A. County beaches, so they're remaining true to the spirit of   
   the   
   >>  show, unlike the Hi-Ho Daddario movie, which only pretended to be in L.A.,   
   >> but   
   >>  shot in Louisiana instead.   
   >>   
   >>  Hopefully they recognize what made the original an international hit:   
   >>  super-hot women in bikinis having heterosexual sex with good-looking dudes.   
   >>  But this is Hollywood, so we're probably going to get lots of gay stuff and   
   >>  some kind of weird transformer dude demanding to be allowed to run around   
   >> in a   
   >>  bikini or something.   
   >>   
   >>  A couple weeks ago I watched a BAYWATCH Prime re-run where it was quite   
   >>  obvious that it was from the pre-woke era of TV. The Beach Boys were guest   
   >>  stars and they were making videos of their various songs on the beach as   
   >> part   
   >>  of the plot. For 'California Girls', the band was surrounded by a flock of   
   >>  gorgeous girls in bikinis-- around 20 of them total. All of them but one   
   >> were   
   >>  blonde goddesses. If the show was made today, twelve of them would be   
   black,   
   >>  four latina, three of them Asian, and one (maybe) would be white, but she'd   
   >> be   
   >>  a dude in a bikini. And half of them would be lesbians.   
   >   
   > There would have to be at least two obese ones so that the   
   > "body-positive" crowd was "represented". And at least one each with   
   > physical and mental handicaps like being in a wheelchair or being autistic.   
      
   And there'd have to be a scene with a Muslim girl in a burkha who has to take   
   a time out from the music video shoot because she has to roll out a prayer rug   
   on the sand for her salaat.   
      
   >>   It's amazing how none of the characters on the show were gay, there were   
   no   
   >>  scenes of dudes kissing each other, no non-binary gender-queer goth   
   >> creatures   
   >>  with face tattoos and metal studs embedded in their heads. Just gorgeous   
   >> girls   
   >>  and the guys who wanted to bang them.   
   >>   
   >>  The whole show is a hate crime by today's standards. Not only am I amazed   
   >> that   
   >>  it's legal to continue to air it, I'm surprised they haven't been required   
   >> to   
   >>  burn the negatives and salt the earth by now   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca