From: nobody@nowhere.com   
      
   On 2/15/2026 7:12 PM, BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:17:43 PM PST, "shawn"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 21:13:08 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Rhino wrote:   
   >>>> On 2026-02-15 2:38 a.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> People who push for this are either religious themselves or are trying   
   >>>>> to score points with those who are religious. I'm calling a spade a   
   >>>>> spade.   
   >>>   
   >>>> I'm not religious and I don't give a crap about trying to curry favour   
   >>>> with the religious types. I simply think that life begins at conception.   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm not ascribing bad political motive to you personally. In America,   
   >>> your beliefs are protected by the free exercise clause regardless of how   
   >>> religious you claim to be.   
   >>   
   >> I fully agree life begins at conception. Nah, life begins when the   
   >> eggs and sperm first come to life. That said, just because those bits   
   >> are alive doesn't make them human. They certainly aren't viable   
   >> outside their protective environment at that point.   
   >   
   > Neither is a quadriplegic.   
      
   It's a political decision masquerading as a holy one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|