XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.global-warming   
   XPost: alt.politics.trump   
   From: mail-a-long@hmn.com   
      
   Trump fights back, replaces struck-down reciprocal tariffs with 10% global   
   import tax   
      
   11   
      
   Fri Feb 20 2026, 02:57 PM EST · 2 minute read   
      
   President Trump introduces a global import tax. Image credit: Chip   
   Somodevilla/Getty Images   
      
   Hours after the Supreme Court struck down broad "reciprocal" tariffs as   
   unlawful, President Donald Trump lashed out at justices, and said he will   
   impose a 10% global tariff under a different trade law with more   
   restrictions and a timetable.   
      
   The announcement follows a 6-3 ruling that the earlier tariffs, imposed   
   under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, exceeded   
   presidential authority and required congressional approval. The now-   
   invalidated tariffs have cost Apple about $2 billion.   
      
   Section 122 provides a narrower legal pathway, but it doesn't soften the   
   economic impact. The statute permits temporary tariffs of up to 15% total   
   for 150 days unless Congress votes to extend them.   
      
   The new increases are still about four times more than Apple paid in   
   tariffs in February 2025.   
   A temporary tariff is still a tax hike   
      
   Section 122 was designed as a short-term balance-of-payments tool, not as a   
   substitute for comprehensive trade policy. A 10% global tariff may carry an   
   expiration date, but it functions immediately as a tax increase on imports.   
      
   Markets can tell the difference between lasting policy and political games.   
   Companies still have to set prices, manage contracts, and reassure   
   investors while dealing with another sudden change in trade rules.   
      
   Apple has already spent hundreds of millions reorganizing manufacturing and   
   logistics after the earlier tariffs. A fresh 10% levy injects new   
   uncertainty before the financial damage from the previous round has even   
   been fully resolved.   
   A global tariff eliminates flexibility   
      
   Section 122 requires non-discriminatory treatment, meaning one uniform   
   tariff rate must apply to imports from every country.   
      
   The requirement discards the administration's earlier country-by-country   
   approach and removes the ability to selectively pressure or reward trading   
   partners. A flat 10% tariff applies equally to China, India, Vietnam, South   
   Korea, and every other hub in Apple's global supply chain.   
   Two suited men seated at a conference table, one adjusting his glasses   
   thoughtfully while the other speaks into a microphone, with a U.S. flag and   
   ornate white wall behind them   
      
   Tim Cook (left) and Trump in a previous meeting. Image credit: White House   
      
   Supply chain diversification was meant to reduce geopolitical exposure. A   
   global tariff undercuts that effort by taxing imports regardless of origin,   
   effectively penalizing companies that adapted to earlier trade disruptions.   
   Consumers, not foreign governments, pay the bill   
      
   Tariffs are paid by U.S. importers at the border, and those costs are   
   routinely passed along through higher prices or absorbed through thinner   
   margins.   
      
   A 10% levy would affect iPhone, Mac, PC components, televisions, networking   
   equipment, and everyday goods. Economists have consistently found that   
   prior tariff rounds were felt by American businesses and households, with   
   no real impact to foreign exporters other than reduced order volume.   
      
   Apple avoided significant retail price increases during earlier tariff   
   swings by absorbing costs and shifting production. A renewed global tariff   
   tests that strategy again, particularly if Congress extends the measure   
   beyond its statutory limit.   
      
   It's not clear how that vote will go. The "reciprocal" tariffs were not   
   well thought of, on either side of the aisle, and it is an election year.   
   Congress and the courts remain the backstop   
      
   Section 122 tariffs expire after 150 days unless Congress acts. Lawmakers   
   can allow the tariff to lapse or vote to extend what amounts to a broad   
   import tax.   
      
   The Supreme Court has already rejected expansive unilateral tariff claims,   
   and new litigation is likely if businesses challenge how Section 122 is   
   applied. For import-dependent companies such as Apple, the pattern is   
   becoming familiar.   
      
   A policy framed as economic leverage operates in practice as a domestic tax   
   increase imposed by executive action. The result is renewed supply chain   
   instability and another round of planning around Washington rather than   
   market demand.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)