From: no_offline_contact@example.com   
      
   On 2026-02-22 5:22 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:   
   > On Feb 22, 2026 at 2:17:27 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman""  wrote:   
   >   
   >> BTR1701  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow   
   Dems   
   >>> for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.   
   >>   
   >>> He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking   
   >>> people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm   
   >>> clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department   
   >>> specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it   
   >>> yourself because they ran out of money.   
   >>   
   >>> And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have   
   >>> to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of   
   >>> yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and   
   >>> vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed   
   >>> that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be   
   >>> able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID,   
   >>> so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population   
   >>> from even being able to shovel snow for him.   
   >>   
   >> Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees   
   >> which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law   
   >> and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.   
   >>   
   >> The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.   
   >>   
   >> You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific   
   >> government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in   
   >> California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved   
   >> with voter ID.   
   >   
   > Sure it can. Under a voter ID requirement, you'd be required to provide your   
   > driver license number on your mail-in ballot, which will then be   
   cross-checked   
   > before the ballot is counted.   
   >   
   > A ballot harvester who's filling out blank ballots will be highly unlikely to   
   > also have a list of dozens or hundreds of people whose names to fill them out   
   > under *and* their DL numbers to go with it.   
   >   
   >   
   I remember hearing a British commentator saying that he was pretty sure   
   that mail-in ballots from Muslim households were mostly being filled in   
   by the man of the house; he strongly suspected that the voting-age women   
   were either told who to vote for or the man simply filled in all their   
   forms on their behalf, probably without even asking them. That should   
   outrage at least all the feminists. It seems like a good argument for   
   minimizing mail-in voting so that women have to vote in person and can   
   then vote for whoever they like. (Of course hubby could still tell them   
   but if he can be kept a distance away, she can vote for whoever she   
   likes and tell him he voted for whoever he instructed her to choose.   
   Mind you, he'd probably take advantage of the rules to say he HAS to go   
   with her to interpret and even fill out the ballot because she's   
   illiterate.)   
      
      
   --   
   Rhino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)