XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.books   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article , tmcd@panix.com wrote:   
      
   > In article <1oz50mwv8ha4o.mf977hvn5nnl.dlg@40tude.net>,   
   > Brian M. Scott  wrote:   
   > >On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:08:15 GMT, Wayne Throop   
   > > wrote in  in   
   > >rec.arts.sf.written,rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.books:   
   > >   
   > >[...]   
   > >   
   > >> After all, *most* mixed-radix systems still   
   > >> write/communicate things in bigendian fashion.   
   > ...   
   > >Or because you're not speaking English: dreihundert zwei und   
   > >vierzig.   
   >   
   > Or because you're not writing English.  Arabic numerals in ARABIC   
   > are little-endian.  They were adopted in the West with much the same   
   > physical appearance and order, and because Western scripts were   
   > left-to-right, they became big-endian.   
      
   Are numbers written in American Indian little-indian and those written in   
   Asian Indian big-indian, or vice versa?   ;-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)