XPost: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.books   
   From: throopw@sheol.org   
      
   : "Brian M. Scott"    
   : It is not entirely independent of either youth or pedantry in writing.   
      
   That instance of it is.  That instance of non-capitalization isn't   
   "further evidence" of diddly squat.   
      
   Aren't armchair psychoanimalists/sociologicalists *in*teresting people?   
   I was just saying the other day, I said, I bet they can come up with   
   more bogus conclusions with the evidence that would fit on the tip of   
   a gnats whisker than just about anybody, I said.  My stars, the conclusions   
   they must jump to and the things they must believe.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)