From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article ,   
   Barry Margolin  wrote:   
      
   > In article <150620151933134736%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
   >  Your Name  wrote:   
   >   
   > > In article <87zj4136v1.fsf@koala.therandymon.com>, RS Wood   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > Just heard a review of the new Jurassic Park movie on the BBC, who   
   > > > reports "Not only does this disaster have plot holes you could drive a   
   > > > steam ship through, but the characters have huge plot holes in their   
   > > > development too.  So you have a dodgy plot with characters behaving   
   > > > illogically for reasons that remain unexplained."   
   > > >   
   > > > Sounds like a good one to miss.  That it's a sequel should have made   
   > > > this obvious.  I'm trying to think of a single sequel that I have   
   > > > enjoyed, and can't think of a single one of them.   
   > >   
   > > I don't know about you in particular, but many people pick The Empire   
   > > Strikes Back as better than the original Star Wars.   
   >   
   > Aren't all the Godfathers considered classics?   
      
   No idea, but "Classic" usually refers to a boring piece of garbage   
   nobody in their right mind wants to watch ... or read in the case of   
   garbage like Shakespeare.  :-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)