home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.movies      Discussing SF motion pictures      28,343 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 27,028 of 28,343   
   Barry Margolin to Your Name   
   Re: [M] Jurassic World ignores 1 and 2,    
   15 Jun 15 08:17:55   
   
   From: barmar@alum.mit.edu   
      
   In article <150620151933134736%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
    Your Name  wrote:   
      
   > In article <87zj4136v1.fsf@koala.therandymon.com>, RS Wood   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > > Just heard a review of the new Jurassic Park movie on the BBC, who   
   > > reports "Not only does this disaster have plot holes you could drive a   
   > > steam ship through, but the characters have huge plot holes in their   
   > > development too.  So you have a dodgy plot with characters behaving   
   > > illogically for reasons that remain unexplained."   
   > >   
   > > Sounds like a good one to miss.  That it's a sequel should have made   
   > > this obvious.  I'm trying to think of a single sequel that I have   
   > > enjoyed, and can't think of a single one of them.   
   >   
   > I don't know about you in particular, but many people pick The Empire   
   > Strikes Back as better than the original Star Wars.   
      
   Aren't all the Godfathers considered classics?   
      
   --   
   Barry Margolin   
   Arlington, MA   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca