From: barmar@alum.mit.edu   
      
   In article <160620150937154266%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
    Your Name  wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   > Barry Margolin  wrote:   
   >   
   > > In article <150620151933134736%YourName@YourISP.com>,   
   > >  Your Name  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > In article <87zj4136v1.fsf@koala.therandymon.com>, RS Wood   
   > > >  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > Just heard a review of the new Jurassic Park movie on the BBC, who   
   > > > > reports "Not only does this disaster have plot holes you could drive a   
   > > > > steam ship through, but the characters have huge plot holes in their   
   > > > > development too.  So you have a dodgy plot with characters behaving   
   > > > > illogically for reasons that remain unexplained."   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Sounds like a good one to miss.  That it's a sequel should have made   
   > > > > this obvious.  I'm trying to think of a single sequel that I have   
   > > > > enjoyed, and can't think of a single one of them.   
   > > >   
   > > > I don't know about you in particular, but many people pick The Empire   
   > > > Strikes Back as better than the original Star Wars.   
   > >   
   > > Aren't all the Godfathers considered classics?   
   >   
   > No idea, but "Classic" usually refers to a boring piece of garbage   
   > nobody in their right mind wants to watch ... or read in the case of   
   > garbage like Shakespeare.  :-)   
      
   OK, I'll ask it differently. Isn't the concensus that all the Godfather   
   movies are great?   
      
   Although if you consider Shakespeare to be garbage, you may not be the   
   best person to ask.   
      
   --   
   Barry Margolin   
   Arlington, MA   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)