Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.movies    |    Discussing SF motion pictures    |    28,343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,042 of 28,343    |
|    rpresser@gmail.com to RS Wood    |
|    Re: [M] Jurassic World ignores 1 and 2,     |
|    23 Jul 15 09:06:28    |
      On Monday, June 15, 2015 at 12:58:56 AM UTC-4, RS Wood wrote:       > Just heard a review of the new Jurassic Park movie on the BBC, who       > reports "Not only does this disaster have plot holes you could drive a       > steam ship through, but the characters have huge plot holes in their       > development too. So you have a dodgy plot with characters behaving       > illogically for reasons that remain unexplained."       >       > Sounds like a good one to miss. That it's a sequel should have made       > this obvious. I'm trying to think of a single sequel that I have       > enjoyed, and can't think of a single one of them.              It's my considered opinion that Jurassic World was originally intended to       be a SyFy Original Movie, like Sharknado, then somehow it acquired the       attention of the actual franchise and got a budget. The effects       benefited. The plot and characters did not.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca